xm15
Member
Recently I came across the following items in an article concerning the recent DC court decision:
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?page=article&Article_ID=14177
* Canada, which has registered handguns since the 1930s and all guns since 1998, recently admitted that it could not identify a single violent crime that had been solved because of registration.
* Hawaii, which has had registration and licensing for around 50 years and well-protected borders, has had the same experience.
Unfortunately, no sources were cited, other than the original Washington Times editorial.
Any suggestions for where I can start looking to verify the above statements?
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?page=article&Article_ID=14177
* Canada, which has registered handguns since the 1930s and all guns since 1998, recently admitted that it could not identify a single violent crime that had been solved because of registration.
* Hawaii, which has had registration and licensing for around 50 years and well-protected borders, has had the same experience.
Unfortunately, no sources were cited, other than the original Washington Times editorial.
Any suggestions for where I can start looking to verify the above statements?