I keep putting my first handgun purchase off due to a tight college budget and various long arm purchases. I plan on purchasing a 9mm semi-auto for high volume round dispension (i.e. practice). For a dedicated practice gun to hone general handgun skills I am curious to know if my judgements regarding the size are correct:
-Full-size: I assume that the longer barrel and sight radius and uncompromised ergonomics of a full-size handgun are the most ideal for general/initial practice.
-Compact: The shorter barrel and sight radius make for somewhat lessened accuracy although the grip remains full-sized and as such the ergonomics are not compromised.
-Sub-compact: shorter barrel and sight radius make for less accuracy, and ergonomics are compromised by a abreviated grip to maximize concealability.
Are my judgements correct? If so am I also correct in assuming that it is best to go with a full size model of the 9mm semi-autos I have in mind for general practice? Thanks in advance, I know this is a stupid question but I am warry of assuming such things.
-Full-size: I assume that the longer barrel and sight radius and uncompromised ergonomics of a full-size handgun are the most ideal for general/initial practice.
-Compact: The shorter barrel and sight radius make for somewhat lessened accuracy although the grip remains full-sized and as such the ergonomics are not compromised.
-Sub-compact: shorter barrel and sight radius make for less accuracy, and ergonomics are compromised by a abreviated grip to maximize concealability.
Are my judgements correct? If so am I also correct in assuming that it is best to go with a full size model of the 9mm semi-autos I have in mind for general practice? Thanks in advance, I know this is a stupid question but I am warry of assuming such things.