pittspilot
Member
A person who has suffered a gun violence tragedy (Giffords, Brady, etc) is not automatically given a pass on critique of their reasoning when they make a voluntary choice to enter into a public debate.
The critique of their reasoning is not an invalidation of their loss.
It is appalling that some legislators are inducing these emotionally vulnerable people to enter into the public fray at a terrible time for them. It confuses the emotional outlet. Those folks should be allowed to grieve in peace not be invited to emote in a political setting which demands vigorous debate of something they surely do not want nor are likely capable of debating in the neccessary rational manner.
When did we lose this simple truth?
The critique of their reasoning is not an invalidation of their loss.
It is appalling that some legislators are inducing these emotionally vulnerable people to enter into the public fray at a terrible time for them. It confuses the emotional outlet. Those folks should be allowed to grieve in peace not be invited to emote in a political setting which demands vigorous debate of something they surely do not want nor are likely capable of debating in the neccessary rational manner.
When did we lose this simple truth?