I get Outdoor life, American Hunter, and Bugle. They are really just to tie me over until I can get out in the woods again. I like BUGLE best, but some of the tips and snippets in OL can be amusing, and sometimes useful.
What's difficult for me is the people writing some of the articles think they are writing hunting prose for their college prof. The articles are so self-indulgent, I can't even read a lot of them, what crap, we don't want to read literature, we want to read meat and potatoes elk stuff. Plus, most of the elk articles are about guided hunts, which I can't afford, and don't do anyways. We hunt public land in thickly forested areas - another thing nobody who writes these articles seems to do; it's all about glassing and long shots after a three day stalk. Where we hunt it's just a bit like combat was - hours of nothing, then a few seconds of a herd blowing up 20 yards from you - a rush of adrenaline - and you either gather yourself and get a shot off, or not. Either way, the herd is gone, and there is no "pristine open valley for you to watch them run gracefully over the neighboring ridge." PUHLEEZE! You walk very, very quietly through the woods, and hope you see them before they see (or hear, or smell) you. Nobody in our party ever killed or even shot at an elk at more than 100 yards. No elk stories like that in Field and Stream or Petersens. I guess we don't hunt sexy enough land, or pay sexy enough guide fees.
Bugle's ethics articles are good, and I like reading about all the land my meager membership dues are helping save for my kid.
Tom