So, I was reading some federal regulations and saw that the NFA used very different language when defining a pistol and the 4 types of long guns (Rifle, SBR, Shotgun, & SBS).
In the definition of a pistol it says the pistol is a pistol if it was originally manufactured to be like.........
For the long gun it specifically states that long guns are those designed or redesigned, made or remade with certain characteristics.
So I thoughtfully presented my case that because a pistol was not originally manufactured to have a vertical foregrip that an end user, (anybody other than a manufacturer) could not simply change the pistol from being a pistol by adding a vertical foregrip - because this would clearly not be an original feature of the gun.
So, do you think they will now "accidentally misplace" my unrelated Form 4, just as punishment for challenging the fact that the "ATF has long held" adding a vertical foregrip to a pistol 'makes' an AOW?
I'd post the letter I sent, but I'm not sure how eloquent it actually is.
In the definition of a pistol it says the pistol is a pistol if it was originally manufactured to be like.........
For the long gun it specifically states that long guns are those designed or redesigned, made or remade with certain characteristics.
So I thoughtfully presented my case that because a pistol was not originally manufactured to have a vertical foregrip that an end user, (anybody other than a manufacturer) could not simply change the pistol from being a pistol by adding a vertical foregrip - because this would clearly not be an original feature of the gun.
So, do you think they will now "accidentally misplace" my unrelated Form 4, just as punishment for challenging the fact that the "ATF has long held" adding a vertical foregrip to a pistol 'makes' an AOW?
I'd post the letter I sent, but I'm not sure how eloquent it actually is.