Unfortunately, Clinton viewed OBL and Al Queda as a "police" issue as well. His admin spent nearly his entire 2nd term debating on how best to take him down. Now before anyone gets upset here, I am not pinging on Clinton in this instance. Al Queda was and is a horse of different color when it comes to counteracting. They are not like any other terror group out there.
Clinton wanted to take down OBL too, late in his 2nd term. But lack of intel and concerns over collateral damage prevented any moves. He did not have the best of relations with the CIA or the military and that certainly didn't help him.
Sure Clinton and his admin made mistakes, but hindsight is 20/20. Reagan and Bush Sr screwed up too. As soon as the Russians vacated Afghanistan, so did we, leaving a political vacuum in its wake.
All were blind to the danger of radical Islamists until late in the 90's (too late).
GWB's admin perhaps took too long to get a policy on OBL on track, but GWB wanted OBL "taken out" in early 2001. But the inertia of government being what it is, well...
What I'm getting at is this, Al Queda and its brethren are not a matter for the "police". They are best fought with the military, not the courts. They must be destroyed, quickly and ruthlessly. I don't believe Kerry's admin will go that route IMHO.
For a great read on OBL/Afghanistan/the Taliban, read "Ghost Wars" by Steve Coll. He goes to great lengths to simply present facts and events in an unbiased manner IMO. Anyone who is interested in how we arrived at the present state of affairs should read this.
Kerry wants my guns and take home pay and besides, he's an elitist snob. So why should I vote for him?
Tim