Dog Soldier
member
I see where Sheriff Joe lost in his bid for reelection. He is 85 years old. The Left was chasing him like a pack of Cur Hounds.You mean someone like Joseph M. "Joe" Arpaio, Sheriff of Maricopa County, AZ ??!!
I see where Sheriff Joe lost in his bid for reelection. He is 85 years old. The Left was chasing him like a pack of Cur Hounds.You mean someone like Joseph M. "Joe" Arpaio, Sheriff of Maricopa County, AZ ??!!
=============================
The experience and attitude I would bring to BATFE would focus on four areas, all consistent with your philosophy of “Make America Great Again”:
1. Restore an environment in which the weapons invented by America’s individual small arms designers were the best in the world, with the attendant benefit to the U.S. Military;
2. Nurture an environment of innovation in all disciplines regulated by BATFE;
3. Preserve and advance the current and historic knowledge and techniques that are slowly being lost here in America;
4. Increase legal commerce (and the attendant tax revenue) in ways consistent with your strong pro-business platform.
Many of these goals can be attained with policy shifts within the BATFE which I would initiate, and would not require Congress to pass new legislation.
================================
Reread those four points and put on your thinking cap.
JR
Folks, spread this as far and wide as you can if you think this would be a good thing for America.
Go to this thread and look for about the 10th post, from 12:26 AM January 2, 2017:
https://theconservativetreehouse.co...en-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-3413152
John Ross
John Ross would be the best thing that has ever happened in regard to the batf if he was put in charge. I will support this in any way I can.Can't really read it right now. Is he good or bad?
It would be really hard to get 51 senate votes for someone who not more than a handful of senators have even heard of.
In all sincerity Mr. Ross, what experience do you have leading any operation with nearly 5K employees? What skill-set do you bring to the table?
It seems like the best thing for the BATFE would be to prune it down to its essential core, distribute the surviving pieces to the FBI or other federal agencies and then just close its doors.
Neither of those stories is particularly "shocking" nowadays, since gun nuts are all considered violent paranoid racists by the gun grabbers anyway, and 'apocalyptic' literature is a huge genre, but back in the 90's & earlier the ideas of modern violent revolution or race wars were quite outrageous to most people who were convinced all the evil dragons had been slain for good with the fall of the Soviet Union. The 'sum of all fears' scenarios are also quite familiar to gun owners at this point as well (which, if rather unrealistic, did at least help shape a moral argument against disarmament for many folks). The militia-novels served their purpose back in the day of promoting the early hard-line/unapolgetic pro-gun stance, but are no longer the 'cautionary tale' they once were purported to be, and aren't particularly notable as 'great literature' apart from that they way 1984 or Fahrenheit 451 were. If anything, the subsequent developments in the non-fiction world after Unintended Consequences begs a modern sequel (which hopefully incorporates some literary lessons learned, in addition to the rather radical historical & technological departure from the original story we've enjoyed the last two decades)
TCB
...I have a hard time believing that John Ross would be nominated as head of the BATFE.
I didn't enter into the gun nut brotherhood until '10 or thereabouts, but my understanding is that in the early days of the net in the 90's, American gun owners were largely isolated, blind, and hunkered down in the face of an unstoppable juggernaut of united & well-funded opposition. Think Dale Gribble (also a dated reference, but not as bad )The federal assault weapons ban had recently be enacted, concealed carry was banned in most parts of the country, and there were no internet gun forums to access a nearly unlimited wealth of knowledge on RKBA and anything firearms related.
Umm, I think I'll pass.
Anyone who is going to lead a Federal Law Enforcement Agency needs to have the respect of the rank-and-file agents in the field and their implicit consent to be led in order to do the job effecitvely. I can't imagine that respect and consent being given to someone whose fictionalized account of the agency portrays them as active enemies of the American people. I would prefer the ATF job go to someone who the rank-and-file will respect and thus fully support in making whatever changes may need to be made.
Waco started out as a disaster because the BATF stormed the building and mostly shot each other after practicing on a mock compound set up like Waco. so if you are a "weirdo" the govt can kill almost 100 people that are there including many kids?The Waco debacle was the FBI's doing; ATF just called them all over to party (not defending their likely frame job of the weirdo Koresh)