Chris17404
Member
As you may know, the BHP is one of the three handgun models I am considering for my first handgun. I went to a local "big box" store and found they had three different models of the BHP in 9mm: the Standard, Mark III, and an all stain-chrome model.
Since polished blue is my favorite, of course I asked to see the Standard model. The blued finish was gorgeous, and the slide seemed to be silky smooth and solid. It just said quality. Unfortunately, the store has a policy to keep trigger locks on all guns so I could not test the trigger pull nor even the LOP. I was disappointed about that. I'll have to find another store in the area that doesn't have that policy. Anyway, I very much disliked the checkered wood grips of this model. They were rough and did not fit my hand well at all. As for the magazine release, each time I pressed it, the magazine freely droipped completely out of the pistol. I was surprised about this since I've always heard the magazine safety prevented this. Would this be considered a good thing or a bad thing? The sights, IMO, were not very good. They were just black without any white dots. I found it hard to line them up.
Then I picked up the Mark III model. I went there expecting not to like the matte finish, but I really did like it. I liked it's finish much better than, say, a Beretta 92FS. The slide on the Mark II was looser than the Standard model, but still felt solid. The grips on this model fit my hand MUCH better. In fact, it almost felt like this model had a longer length grip (i.e. extended past the bottom of my hand) than the Standard model. I doubt this was the case, but it speaks well for how the grips fit me better. The I liked the sights a lot better too. They were three white dots. Again, I couldn't test the trigger.
Lastly, I tried the satin-chrome model. It felt about the same as the Mark III, but had different molded grips on it that felt pretty good too. The slide had what appeared to be a bit of tarnish on it. Not sure what it was.
Overall, the Mark III fit me best, but I REALLY loved the finish and seemingly better quality of the Standard model. Right now, I'd have to say I'm leaning toward the Standard model, and will simply replace the grips and sights.
One other thing... the date code in the serial numbers of both the Standard and Mark III was MW, which is 2000 I believe. That kinda scared me a bit. Should I be weary about purchasing a gun that's been sitting and being handled for 6 years without any maintenance attention given to it? It didn't sit well with me.
Well, that's me first first-hand impression of the BHP. I'm looking forward to hopefully try one at a range sometime if I can find a place that has one to rent. I am taking the NRA first steps pistol training course Monday night at a local range. They have a pretty-good selection of guns to rent that I can use. No BHPs, but I was thinking something to it would be a 1911. I was also considering a Sig 226.
Thanks for listening... and if you have any comments, please fire away.
Chris
P.S. I know most of you recommended the S&W 686P as my first handgun. Rest assured that one is definitely still in the running. I'm just "playing the field" a bit before I decide!
Since polished blue is my favorite, of course I asked to see the Standard model. The blued finish was gorgeous, and the slide seemed to be silky smooth and solid. It just said quality. Unfortunately, the store has a policy to keep trigger locks on all guns so I could not test the trigger pull nor even the LOP. I was disappointed about that. I'll have to find another store in the area that doesn't have that policy. Anyway, I very much disliked the checkered wood grips of this model. They were rough and did not fit my hand well at all. As for the magazine release, each time I pressed it, the magazine freely droipped completely out of the pistol. I was surprised about this since I've always heard the magazine safety prevented this. Would this be considered a good thing or a bad thing? The sights, IMO, were not very good. They were just black without any white dots. I found it hard to line them up.
Then I picked up the Mark III model. I went there expecting not to like the matte finish, but I really did like it. I liked it's finish much better than, say, a Beretta 92FS. The slide on the Mark II was looser than the Standard model, but still felt solid. The grips on this model fit my hand MUCH better. In fact, it almost felt like this model had a longer length grip (i.e. extended past the bottom of my hand) than the Standard model. I doubt this was the case, but it speaks well for how the grips fit me better. The I liked the sights a lot better too. They were three white dots. Again, I couldn't test the trigger.
Lastly, I tried the satin-chrome model. It felt about the same as the Mark III, but had different molded grips on it that felt pretty good too. The slide had what appeared to be a bit of tarnish on it. Not sure what it was.
Overall, the Mark III fit me best, but I REALLY loved the finish and seemingly better quality of the Standard model. Right now, I'd have to say I'm leaning toward the Standard model, and will simply replace the grips and sights.
One other thing... the date code in the serial numbers of both the Standard and Mark III was MW, which is 2000 I believe. That kinda scared me a bit. Should I be weary about purchasing a gun that's been sitting and being handled for 6 years without any maintenance attention given to it? It didn't sit well with me.
Well, that's me first first-hand impression of the BHP. I'm looking forward to hopefully try one at a range sometime if I can find a place that has one to rent. I am taking the NRA first steps pistol training course Monday night at a local range. They have a pretty-good selection of guns to rent that I can use. No BHPs, but I was thinking something to it would be a 1911. I was also considering a Sig 226.
Thanks for listening... and if you have any comments, please fire away.
Chris
P.S. I know most of you recommended the S&W 686P as my first handgun. Rest assured that one is definitely still in the running. I'm just "playing the field" a bit before I decide!