Al Thompson
Moderator Emeritus
One thing - handguns (with the exception of the very large calibers, IE .44Mag) just suck as fight stoppers. What they have going for them is handyness. The difference between .22LR and 9mm ball is much less than you would imagine. When you get into the better and bigger hollowpoints, there is some improvement, but it's still more like sticking someone with a knife that shooting them with a rifle. Very little shock and not much bleeding, so shot placement gets critical fast.
First rule of a gunfight is have a gun. Handguns check that block.
Second rule is have a reliable firearm. If ball is what works in your firearm, for goodness sakes use ball. It's very hard to hurt someone with a jammed HG. To repeat, reliability must be as near 100% as possible.
Much furthur down the list is caliber and bullet type.
Until a few years ago, the only "one shot stops" I had inside info on were performed with a .25 ACP and a M36 loaded with 158SWC. Ain't the arrow, it's the indian.
First rule of a gunfight is have a gun. Handguns check that block.
Second rule is have a reliable firearm. If ball is what works in your firearm, for goodness sakes use ball. It's very hard to hurt someone with a jammed HG. To repeat, reliability must be as near 100% as possible.
Much furthur down the list is caliber and bullet type.
Until a few years ago, the only "one shot stops" I had inside info on were performed with a .25 ACP and a M36 loaded with 158SWC. Ain't the arrow, it's the indian.