Lucky Number 7 (Shot that is)

Status
Not open for further replies.

TrapperReady

Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Messages
2,732
Most of us are familiar with the standard shot sizes for upland hunting and target shooting. Pheasants seem to fall best when hit with #5 or #6. For target shooting, anything from #7.5 through #9 is popular and effective.

#7.5 shot is an interesting choice, since it is approved for most clay games, but also quite effective on game. But what about plain old #7 shot?

The nominal diameter of a #7.5 pellet is .095". A pellet of #7 is .010". How much difference does that extra .005" make? I think it's worth investigating.

Last year, I bought a case of 16ga 2 1/2" shells loaded with 7/8 oz of #7 shot. My intent was to use it for grouse, chukars, quail, and other "smaller than pheasant" sized birds.

A couple weeks ago, I went out and shot a few rounds of trap using a Winchester Model 12 and this ammo. While the shooting was from 16 yards, I was amazed at how much more devastating the hits were on the targets (I typically use #7.5 in my own reloads). My immediate thought was that this gun was patterning extremely tightly.

However, the pattern-board showed that while it was throwing roughly Full patterns, it wasn't ultra-dense. In fact, it was throwing a very even pattern... but with 1/4 oz less shot than the shells I normally shoot. With fewer pellets (due to the increased size and reduced capacity), I would not have expected the targets to disintegrate as completely as they did.

I'm intrigued by the performace, and plan to do quite a bit of hunting with this load and gun over the next few months. We'll see how things work out. With any luck, I may have a field report on the usefullness for doves within a week.

BTW, I did read an article in The Double Gun Journal a while ago talking about #7 shot as being a popular game load in England. The gentleman who wrote it specifically recommended an ounce of #7 as a good all-around game and target load. IIRC, he mentioned that the folks shooting International Trap liked the 24 gram loads with the #7 shot, as it helped improve the performance of the lighter payload.

So, for you handloaders out there, it may be something with which to mess around. Once caveat is that you may need to check the rules where you shoot, as some ranges have a maximum shot size limit of #7.5.
 
The late Don Zutz was fond of 7 shot,so is Les Greevy,who may be the premier shotgun ballistician alive today.

Both of the ranges I shoot at on any regular basis limit shot to 7.5 or smaller, but there's no other drawback to it.

BTW, the Brits shot sizes fall a little different than ours. What they call a 6 is our 7. On incoming driven pheasant where the vitals are exposed, it's deadly. Here, where our walkup style of hunting means more going away shots, it may be slightly less deadly. Still, if I can kill them with 7 1/2s, I should be able to do so with 7s.

BPI offers 7 shot. Were I able to do more wild pheasant hunting, I'd probably get some and tinker up some ringneck whackers.....
 
Thanks for the reminder about the difference in sizes. The DGJ article metioned that, and had "translated", so they were talking specifically about the .010" shot size.

If it were permissible (which it really isn't), I'd love to work up a 7/8oz target load using #7s. I'd bet with the added size, you could get the patterns to hold tighter for a longer distance, making it effective at ranges comparable with a greater quantity (and therefore recoil) of shot.
 
Yes, indeed, but the downside's a lower pellet count. Still, ought to be fun to tinker with.

I note BPI carries 6.5 shot also.Might be interesting to build matching loads in 7.5, 7, and 6.5 and see how they do at 40 yards....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top