M1 Garand and Carbine

Status
Not open for further replies.

strat81

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2006
Messages
3,912
Location
Nebraska
(This is NOT a Garand vs. Carbine thread. It is a new vs. old thread.)

I preface this by saying I have only owned and been interested in guns for about 6 months. However, it's an addicting hobby.

My grandfather passed a few years ago and he was, by far, the most influential figure in my life. Part of the greatest generation, he spent several years serving his country in Europe during World War II. From what he told us, during the war, he was a technical sergeant in a tank destroyer unit and he often dealt with repairing and maintaining the small arms of his men. He rarely spoke of his days overseas. He mentioned he liberated some concentration camps, so I'm sure speaking of such horror wasn't a favorite pastime. I'm in the process of looking for photos of him with his rifle so that I may buy what he carried.

I have fired a rifle once in my life. One round, that's it. I know practically nothing about rifles, let alone vintage rifles, milsurp rifles, or used rifles. I am aware of the CMP program, gun shows, and Gunbroker as potential places to get one of these weapons. Of course, I am not made of money and cannot afford one of the Miltech refurbished weapons. I am not opposed to getting an original USGI, but have concerns about buying a 50 year old weapon. I do not know what to check for or how to fix them. I also don't want the first year of ownership to spent at a gunsmith.

I want to shoot this gun, not hang it on the wall. I am not expecting 1/2" groups at 300 yards, but would like something that resembles accuracy.

What is my best option? A new/slightly used Springfield Armory Garand/Auto-Ordnance Carbine (Kahrbine) or an original WWII-era USGI? Please note, if I do get a new rifle, it will be from one of the two companies mentioned above. What about the different grades of CMP weapons? Will a rack grade weapon shoot a target that looks like a blind guy pulled the trigger? Will it need to be 'smithed right out of the box?

I am not looking for opinions of "get the USGI because the new ones are fake." And please don't tell me that the SA/AO guns are junk. I trust those brands, and I trust something that's brand new more than something that maybe have literally been through a war. This is more about knowledge and expertise. However, if you know of trustworthy sellers of USGI weapons, please tell me. If anything, my grandfather was practical, and certainly wouldn't have liked it if I bought an old one because it's the "real deal" or if I bought a new one "just to have a new one, even though the old ones were better."

Any books you can recommend on Garands and M1 Carbines (from a technical perspective) would be appreciated too!

Thanks in advance for your help!
 
From what I've seen/read, the "Service Grade" CMP M1 Carbines are in much better condition than the M1 Garands. If you get a "Rack Grade" Garand (all that's available), it's probably going to require some work to shoot accurately. So in that sense, the $500 Carbines are probably a better deal than the $400 Garands if you want a shooter.

On the other hand, CMP 30-06 ammo is a better deal than .30 carbine ammo that's around.

CMP will stand behind what they sell so if you have any problems with it (other than accuracy or cosmetics), they will replace it or fix it.

As far as Springfield Garands and Kahr carbines, they are probably fine, but kinda pricy. I'd buy a Rack Grade Garand and send it off for rebuild before I'd buy a new Springfield. If only because it will hold it's value better.
 
I know a couple of guys that have SA Inc Garands. They seem to spend a lot of time in transit between the owner and the factory.

Get the CMP rack grade. If it won't shoot, put it in a new stock ($80). If it still doesn't shoot, put on a new barrel ($165).

Ty
 
"...buying a 50 year old weapon..." Don't worry about that. You have to work very hard to damage either a carbine or M-1 rifle.
"...Springfield Armory Garand/Auto-Ordnance Carbine..." Both are expensive copies. The M-1's MSRP is $1439. $777 for the Kahr.
Go with the CMP carbine and/or M-1. They check 'em over for safety before they sell 'em and you know what you're getting. Plus they stand behind what they sell.
"...Any books..." Hatcher's Book of the Garand and Scott Duff's Carbine book. Your local gun shop or Amazon for the former, here for the latter.
http://www.scott-duff.com/
Get a copy of Hatcher's Notebook too.
Go here too. http://www.surplusrifle.com/index.asp
 
I have never held or fired an aftermarket carbine that handles or shoots as well as my Inland. No I won't say the AO suck, but they aren't as good. Even if they have been to war, they have been pretty well inspected before they were sold through the NRA or CMP. (My grandfather paid I think $15 for mine when he joined back in the 50s.)

+1 for how expensive the carbine ammo is. It's the only brass I religiously chase around, even when I'm between reloading setups.
 
Get an M1 garand they shoot just fine even the greeks. you may have to work on it a little but you don't need a smith to do it. mostly just swaping out parts you would have to take apart anyway when you clean it.

Don't expect to be able to shoot it with out fully taking it apart and cleaning it.

The manual you get with the CMP purchase is good but not the best. Get Scott Duff's book on the M1 garand and it will walk you through most everything you'll need to know.

changing out the stock will be easy. You can also glass bed it to improve accuracy.

Changing out the barrel is something best left to a professional.
 
I got an old "beat up USGI garand" for the history, and the fact that it was the cheapest way to get one (CMP). The SA are cast recievers, other than that, it's a $1,000+ version of the gun you can get from the CMP for around $400. If you're getting the carbine, whatever floats your boat would work.

These things will work, and are going to be decently forgiving. You said you are not "made of money", so I'd say the Garand, for the CMP prices and ammo prices (it's a purely economic argument, the fact that they're USGI is just nifty). However, it has some "oomph" to it, which you may or may not enjoy, only having shot a rifle once. If you think recoil will be an issue, the carbine's the way to go. Once again, I'm going to get a Carbine through the CMP, just because they're $200+ cheaper than the Kahr. As a bonus, the USGI stuff will accumulate value, while the new stuff won't. That, and it's a lot easier to treat my already beat up garand like a "beater gun" that I don't have to baby (but I still do) than worry about it like I do my new stuff.

From a purely economic standpoint, I'd say get the USGI stuff--Garand will be cheaper overall, but the carbine will have less recoil. Though, since your granddad was with a tank unit, I would maybe bet that he had the Carbine--smaller, lighter for personnel that weren't necissarily intended to be in the forward trenches.

And my garand will do very well accuracy-wise. 3" at 100 yards offhand, and somehow I can manage to get 6 our of 8 rounds into a target the size of a human head at 300 yards (yes, I know the MOA conversions don't match up, but I don't question a good thing). It'll do you well, and it's fun to boot, and the sights are easy to use--look through the hole, put the post in the middle of the circle, and whatever it's on, you hit.

Happy hunting, my friend.
 
Another option, if you don't go CMP route is to get it from a reputable Garand/Carbine specialized shop. It will be more expensive, but that is because the amount of labor to bring it up to spec.

I got my M1 Carbine from one of the outfit. It looks like a new gun, and it functions flawless.

Good Luck,

-Pat
 
I am not made of money and cannot afford one of the Miltech refurbished weapons.

Thats a GOOD thing :)

I am not opposed to getting an original USGI, but have concerns about buying a 50 year old weapon.

Those 50 year old weapons will be better made and last longer that the newly made copies.

Get an M1 Garand from "The Garand Guy" http://www.garandguy.com/, or
"DGR" http://www.dgrguns.com/. Another option is to get a CMP rack grade and have DGR rebuild it. You can't go wrong either way.
 
Accuracy is subjective

Anytime I hear someone say "I want an accurate gun" or "my rifle is real accurate" I wonder by what measure.

The bench-rest, match rifle shooter's accuracy is measured in thousanths of an inch at 500 yards.

Back-woods Billy-Bob's accuracy is measured in whether he can hit a beer can at 50 feet.

If you're shooting tin cans and milk jugs, the CMP rifles will do fine. I doubt there would be much difference in accuracy between the rack grade rifle and the carbine. Both can be relied on to consistently blast milk jugs at 100 yards.

My grandpa used to tell me about training with the Garand during WWII (he was one of the first soldiers in Japan after they surrendered). I just bought a CMP M1 rifle and I love it. It's plenty accurate for me.
 
It's a M1903

Thank you everyone for the many good opinions. I decided to make my choice a CMP. HOWEVER...

My cousin was able to dig up a picture of my grandfather with his rifle. Methinks it's a M1903, not an M1. And I was totally psyched about getting an M1 Carbine! I guess I can always get both... ;)

I'll stick with CMP on this too.

grandpa%20with%20rifle.jpg
 
Nice Photo!

Strat81--Nice photo of Gramps in his younger days! The rifle he's shooting is a 1903 Springfield. Not a 1903-A3, which had a receiver sight, and not a Garand, which is an autoloader, not a bolt gun.

The pic must be from early in the war--Note Gramps' WWI-era helmet. As I understand it a few of those were issued for WWII, before the making of the big round WWII-era helmets got up to speed.

A real "keeper" piece of history, there! :)
 
Last edited:
As others have said, do the carbine or Garand from the CMP. I have purchased 3 (in the last 3 months, Lets talk addiction.) Each of them have been to the range and are good shooters. The each have their own level of accuracy. All of them are more accurate than I am at this point. 2 are Field grades, the last was a rack grade. For the money, they are a great deal for a good shooter.
 
Count me as another fan of the CMP; I've got 2 M1 Garands, 1 1903 Springfield, and will soon be ordering an M1 Carbine from them. Great organization, great people.
 
My first centerfire rifle was an Iver Johnson replica M1 Carbine.
I bought it to hunt coyote and it was all I could afford at the time.
Ammunition cost $12.50 a box for Winchester hollowpoint or Remington softpoint.
The rifle was sufficently accurate to kill coyote to 150 yards, past that range it was a gamble and most of my killing shots were taken within 100 yards.
I managed to kill enough pelt dogs my first year to buy a Ruger Mini 14.
I sold the Carbine after the secoind hunt with the Mini 14 because it did everything the Carbine did not do.

I have owned a few Carbines since then and quite a few Garand rifles too.
I have not owned another Mini 14 and sold my first after my third season.

I don't own a Carbine now, I do own a half dozen Garand rifles and will always have at least one of these on hand.
 
Aw come on.

fatelk: "The bench-rest, match rifle shooter's accuracy is measured in thousanths of an inch at 500 yards."

I'm sure you mean inches at 500 yards. Even a consistent 1/2 MOA at 500 yards, which would be almost super-human, amounts to 2.5 inches. Any imperfection in range estimation, elevation, pressure, temperature and wind, not to mention muzzle velocity deviation, will result in practical accuracy that's much worse than that. In practice, my sub MOA Rem 700 setup has at the very best, with a perfect human at the trigger and very good estimate of conditions, a probability of a hit of well below 50% at 500 yards on a four inch circle.

You can get better than that of course, but you have to have the most amazingly consistent ammunition, shooter, and perfect estimation of atmospheric conditions, and then you do slightly better. Thousandths of an inch don't even enter into the discussion, since the wind alone results in inches of variance between shots.
 
So much more that just a rifle...

I just ordered my first M1, M1903 and M1903A1 from the CMP today and I know the wait will be horrible. I can't wait to take them down to parade rest, clean everything and learn them from the ground up, just like grandpa did.

My first any only rifle so far is a Winchester Model 77 .22 that my grandpa gave me many years ago. It's a treasure I'll keep until it's time to pass on to my grandson, just like grandpa did.

I remember grandpa telling me the stories of his days in the Corps and on Guadalcanal and how they were issued old WWI bolt action rifles that I know now to be the 1903.

Grandpa's gone over 20 years now but I know one thing's for certain. The day my M1903(s) arrive, I'm gonna sit down with the rifle in my arms and have a good long talk with my grandpa.

John Warren Kiefaber, PVT, USMCR
0005photo.jpg
 
Last edited:
There is an article over at Fulton's website entitled something like, "Why a CMP Garand?".

It pretty well explains why some of us are fond of the old warhorse.
 
And now you just rekindled my want of a 1903. Thanks a lot :cuss: :p :D .

That is an amazingly clear picture for its age. I wish I had similar pictures of any of my family members who served in the war. It's great that you are able to connect not only your family heritage, but to a great time in american history as well. I envy you for that.
 
Don't be concerned about the age of the rifle. Metallurgy was a mature science by then, besides they used only forgings, not cheap MIM ( metal injection molded) parts, also the amount of machining was substantial. No one can afford to put that amount of time and machining into a firearm today. The best book for working on either rifle is Kuhnhausen's 2 volume set from Midway.
 
I'll add to the 'don't worry about the age' comments. These were made as well as any rifle in the world, of good steel and proven designs. Unless damaged somehow, they'll still be shooting when you're old and grey. And passing it to a grandkid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top