Austin Charles
Member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2003
- Messages
- 67
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/bal-md.guns12feb12,0,1109438.story?coll
Compromise offered on gun ban measure
By Kimberly A.C. Wilson
Sun Staff
Originally published February 12, 2004
Sen. John A. Giannetti Jr., the swing vote on a proposal to ban 45 assault
weapons beginning when the federal ban expires this year, is offering middle
ground between legalizing the firearms and banning them outright.
His idea: enact an identical state version of the federal ban on 19
semiautomatic weapons.
A Democrat representing Prince George's and Anne Arundel counties, Giannetti
called his proposal "a reasonable compromise."
Giannetti said that he offered the amendment to the proposed ban after
learning at a packed hearing this week that both the Fraternal Order of Police and
the Maryland State Police opposed the bill .
"That surprised me," he said, and prompted him to poll sheriffs in his
jurisdiction for their thoughts on banning the weapons.
The bill, and a House version, are supported by more than 70 lawmakers. The
Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee could vote on the matter as early as
today.
Compromise offered on gun ban measure
By Kimberly A.C. Wilson
Sun Staff
Originally published February 12, 2004
Sen. John A. Giannetti Jr., the swing vote on a proposal to ban 45 assault
weapons beginning when the federal ban expires this year, is offering middle
ground between legalizing the firearms and banning them outright.
His idea: enact an identical state version of the federal ban on 19
semiautomatic weapons.
A Democrat representing Prince George's and Anne Arundel counties, Giannetti
called his proposal "a reasonable compromise."
Giannetti said that he offered the amendment to the proposed ban after
learning at a packed hearing this week that both the Fraternal Order of Police and
the Maryland State Police opposed the bill .
"That surprised me," he said, and prompted him to poll sheriffs in his
jurisdiction for their thoughts on banning the weapons.
The bill, and a House version, are supported by more than 70 lawmakers. The
Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee could vote on the matter as early as
today.