MD: Group critical of gun board

Status
Not open for further replies.

Harry Tuttle

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2003
Messages
3,093
Group critical of gun board
--------------------

Decisions on safety locks, small weapons weaken law, says CeaseFire Maryland

By Gus G. Sentementes
Sun Staff

May 1, 2005


A gun-control advocacy group is complaining that a crucial provision in the
state's five-year-old gun safety act has been gutted over the past year by a
state board that regulates the sale of handguns.

But a top representative of the Maryland Handgun Roster Board countered that
it has followed the law and based its decisions on expert opinions.

With the Responsible Gun Control Act of 2000, Maryland became the first
state to require manufacturers to move toward selling handguns with gun
locks integrated into the design in order to prevent accidental deaths.

Gun-control advocates claim the roster board's decision-making over the past
few years increasingly reflects a slant toward gun-rights interests that has
effectively eroded the law through a relaxed interpretation.

The law defines the locks as "integrated mechanical safety devices" that are
"built into a handgun."

The authority to interpret the law rests with the 11-member board. The board
consists of two law enforcement representatives, a state prosecutor, a
National Rifle Association representative, a gun industry member, two
engineers, a gun-control advocate and three citizen members.

Leah Barrett, executive director of CeaseFire Maryland, a gun-control
advocacy group, said that the board has become ineffective.

"They have a very definite economic interest in watering down the law,"
Barrett said. "We don't have an economic interest in this."



Debating gun locks

The board declined recently to review a decision made last year allowing a
gun lock that gun-control advocates say should be restricted under the law.

During the meeting this past week, the board approved another similar
device, as well as two small handguns that gun-control advocates say are too
easily concealed.

Gun-rights advocates, dealers and manufacturers criticized the integrated
lock requirement from the law's inception in 2000, saying it was
impractical, unnecessary and difficult to implement.

Robert Biemiller, who attends the board meetings as the designee for Col.
Thomas E. "Tim" Hutchins, the state police superintendent, said the
integrated locks that the board has approved satisfy the law's requirements.


Biemiller said that the engineers who sit on the board determined that two
of the locks criticized by CeaseFire do become an integrated feature of the
gun once they are properly installed.

"The majority of the board determined that these things do get built into
the gun," said Biemiller, who directs the state police's office of strategic
planning. "You'd have to go to a gunsmith to get it out [without a key]. To
take it out any other way would destroy the weapon."

But Grace Huber, a member of the board allied with CeaseFire, said she voted
against the locks - known as the Omega and the Interbore - because their
design was contrary to what she believed the law had intended.

The board has approved approximately 20 locks as "integrated mechanical
safety devices," but gun-control advocates have singled out the Omega and
Interbore models because they consider them to be external devices.

"It's gotten to the point that a gunsmith could put any type of lock in it,"
said Huber. "I don't think this was the intent of the law when it was
passed. Any gun lock you put in can be taken out."



Final say

The 2000 law was meant to curtail accidental gun deaths involving young
children, and the board should interpret it based on its legislative intent,
gun-control advocates say.

But the board has the ultimate authority in assessing whether particular
handguns and safety technologies satisfy Maryland's gun laws, according to a
2002 opinion by Attorney General J. Joseph Curran Jr.

"The roster board went to the attorney general for a definition, and [he]
responded it was up to the roster board to define - and that's what they
have done," said John H. Josselyn, legislative vice president of the
Associated Gun Clubs of Baltimore, which advocates for the right to bear
arms. "They are merely following the law."

Gun-rights advocates "would argue that [the Omega and Interbore models] are
an internal lock," said Barrett, CeaseFire's executive director. "Yes, when
it's actually in the gun, but it's not integrated. It's not built into the
design of the gun."

Biemiller said about 1,400 different handguns can be sold legally in
Maryland. He estimated that fewer than one in 10 handguns brought for review
before the board get rejected.



Concealed guns

Barrett criticized the board for approving two guns this week that had
2-inch-long barrels, saying they are too easy to conceal.

But Biemiller said the board considers other factors, in addition to how
concealable it is, before approving a handgun.



According to a 1988 state law that targeted cheap, poorly designed handguns
known as "Saturday night specials," the board must consider, before
approval, how concealable the gun is, its ballistic accuracy, its weight,
quality of materials and manufacture, reliability and caliber.

The law does not set specific parameters for each category.

Legislators created the roster board to review the guns and to weed out
cheap inferior ones that were easily obtained by criminals.

Biemiller said that under the law, the ease of concealment is only one of
several factors the board considers in approving a gun.

"It's not intended to restrict a quality firearm strictly because of size,"
Biemiller said of the earlier law. "Saturday night specials were cheap,
inferior products."

Copyright (c) 2005, The Baltimore Sun

Link to the article:
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/lo...y?coll=bal-local-headlines&ctrack=1&cset=true
 
actually our MD legiscritters are getting tired of the Leah Barrett squakings

she may find herself muzzled next season
 
kinda makes me grin seeing a rabid anti with the last name of "barrett"

Well, even more ironically, her name up until at least 1999 was Gail Gunn :evil:
 
Legislators created the roster board to review the guns and to weed out cheap inferior ones that were easily obtained by criminals.

Too bad the legislators weren't bright enough to think of disarming the criminals instead of the law-abiding citizens. Of course, many of Maryland's legislators are criminals, so perhaps they simply didn't care to inconvenience themselves.
 
P95 wins the prize! They take themselves very seriously and are deadly serious about wanting us disarmed. People tend to toss around the term "extremist" very casually these days, but Leah Barrett is the epitome of the term.

She has a singular mission, which is to remove ALL guns from the hands of law abiding citizens in MD. She knows we'll never get the guns from the criminals, but as long as she can continue to disarm us she can at least say that she is "doing something" (for the children of course)

Standing Wolf also wins a prize for his observation :) Fortunately for us, some of the establishment is starting to see this as well. Here's an editorial from the Annapolis Capitol from Monday, May 3:

Editorial
 
Typical gun bigot mentality: Waaaah! Our pet mechanism/barrier between the people and their arms isn't as effective as we planned! Waaaah!

We had the same thing when the ATF was approving repairs of "assault weapon" recievers...they complained that ATF approval of a lawful activity, that of people repairing their lawful products was wrecking their plan to diminish the number of "assault weapons" over time due to breakage.


The fact that they were unable to get control of that board, and that the legislature is getting sick of them is a hopeful, bright sign for the future.

That being said, I'd just as soon such a board did not exist, for it remains a target football to be wrested away from the home team.
 
I don't have firsthand experience with it, but Springfield's ILS seems like it could be unlocked with a paper clip (somebody correct me if I'm wrong). How exactly is the Omega lock (which is an excellent device even without draconian laws like we have IMO) easier to get past than the ILS system?

The 2000 law was meant to curtail accidental gun deaths involving young
children, and the board should interpret it based on its legislative intent,
gun-control advocates say
can any gun grabber who happens to be lurking please explain how the Omega lock is less effective at attaining this goal than something like the ILS? I've seen it firsthand and the Omega lock renders a gun completely useless and makes it impossible to load. A person who would leave a loaded gun where a young child could get it won't be any more likely to use the ILS than they will to use the Omega lock, and they won't be any less likely to lose the Omega lock than they will be to lose the key to the ILS.
 
The Springfield ILS basically has two holes that you can fill with a paperclip, yeah. I haven't done it (I removed it a long time ago), but it looks pretty silly.
 
Well, even more ironically, her name up until at least 1999 was Gail Gunn

Well, according to the Maryland Board of Elections campaign contribution search, her name is Leah Gunn Barrett. Why'd she changer her name?
 
Well, according to the Maryland Board of Elections campaign contribution search, her name is Leah Gunn Barrett. Why'd she changer her name?

Well, her husband's last name is Barrett so that's pretty easy to speculate on. But it's not know if she was married when she was working for Tetra-Pak in England. She was using the name Gail Gunn at that time.

The Gail Gunn Creature

She also used the name Gail Gunn when they purchased their home in Montgomery County.

Tax Records

$870,000 for a house in 1999....that's a lot even for Montgomery County. :what:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top