Michael Moore Sued by Iraq War Vet

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Mar 7, 2003
Messages
1,073
Yeah...

It seems as if the fallout caused by Fahrenheit 9/11 will never die down.


A Massachusetts national guardsman filed an $85 million lawsuit against Michael Moore in Suffolk Superior Court last week, accusing the filmmaker of distorting a TV interview to portray the soldier as anti-war in his scathing 2004 documentary about the Bush administration post-Sept. 11, 2001.


Sgt. Peter Damon, 33, has stated that Moore didn't have his permission to use pieces of the on-camera interview he gave in 2003 to an NBC Nightly News correspondent at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington D.C. Damon's appearance in Fahrenheit 9/11 resulted in a "loss of reputation, emotional distress, embarrassment, and personal humiliation" for him, court documents state.


Damon is suing for $75 million and his wife is seeking another $10 million for the "mental distress and anguish suffered by her spouse."


The lawsuit states that "[Fahrenheit 9/11] creates a substantially fictionalized and falsified implication of a wounded serviceman who was left behind when Plaintiff was not left behind but supported, financially and emotionally, by the active assistance of the president, the United States and his family, friends, acquaintances and community."


Damon, a double amputee, lost both of his arms while stationed in Iraq when a tire on a Black Hawk Helicopter he was servicing exploded. Another reservist was killed.


In Moore's film Damon is shown lying on a gurney, covered in bandages. He says he feels as if he's "being crushed in a vise," adding, "but [the painkillers] do a lot to help it. And they take a lot of the edge off of it."


The scene prior to Damon's features U.S. Rep. Jim McDermott (news, bio, voting record), a Democrat from Washington state, saying, "You know, [those in the Bush administration] say they're not leaving any veterans behind, but they're leaving all kinds of veterans behind."


In his lawsuit, Damon has argued that the juxtaposition of those two scenes made it sound as if the military and the Bush administration had left him to grapple alone with pain or possibly even a drug addiction when, in reality, he "agrees with and supports the president and the United States' war effort and was not left behind."


NBC had been questioning Damon about the painkiller he was using, a new drug the military was distributing to wounded veterans.


"They took the clip because it was a gut-wrenching scene," Damon told Fox News Tuesday. "They sandwiched it in. [Moore] was using me as ammunition."


Miramax Films, NBC, and Lions Gate Entertainment are also named in the suit, according to Fox News.


The controversial Fahrenheit 9/11 was a smash hit for Moore and Miramax, winning the Palme d'Or at the 2004 Cannes Film Festival and grossing more than $222 million worldwide.


The film, which focused pretty one-sidedly on the Bush administration's response to 9/11 (sorely lacking, according to Moore) and its instigation of the war in Iraq (inexcusable, Moore said) was passed over come Oscar time, however, partly because the director entered his production in the Best Picture category, rather than take a run at Best Documentary.


Damon told the New York Post that Moore couldn't have picked a worse guy to pin the charge of being anti-war on.


"I'm the most fortunate disabled guy," he said. "I was complaining about the pain I would've been having [if it weren't for the painkiller]."


Damon's lawyer, Dennis Lynch, also weighed in with the Associated Press.


"It's upsetting to him because he's lived his life supportive of his government, he's been a patriot, he's been a soldier, and he's now being portrayed in a movie that is the antithesis of all that," Lynch said.

Phone calls from the AP and Fox News to Moore and Miramax were not returned.

Source here.
 
I've always wondered why Charlton Heston didn't sue Michael Moore.

Moore cut up his speeches and made it appear that his attitude and his words were quite different from what they really were.

http://www.hardylaw.net/Truth_About_Bowling.html

When that's done as parody, it's one thing, but Moore did not present this as a parody edit.

Perhaps Heston et al. figured Moore didn't need the free publicity.

This veteran, however, is coming from a different place, and may be able to turn this into the BAD publicity it ought to be for Moore. I hope he does -- not because I disagree with Michael Moore, but because he is an unscrupulous liar who stirs up the ignorant to make himself rich, without regard to the consequences for individuals, our nation and our world.
 
Light em up

My thanks go to Sergeant Damon, for his service and sacrifice, and for bringing the fat gas hat to court.

I hope he lights him up.

My money is on an out of court settlement, but I would LOVE to see what a jury takes out of Moore's hide.
 
I believe this isn't the first time Moore has been sued for something like this.
 
What I wouldn't give...

to be on that jury, and be able to stick it to that idiot... by the way has anyone seen "Fahrenhype 911"?. It's hard to find, but what theis guy does is reinterview some of the people who Moore interviewed. Alot of them were outraged at how he twisted their words. It's a very enlightening film.
 
I dunno about sued, but Moore did exactly this same stunt with one or both of the makers of "Southpark", I forget which.

In that incident he got a brief non-committal response from one and then Moore did a brief anti-gun cartoon of his own faking the Southpark style to make it look like they'd signed on with Moore.

They didn't sue Moore, they just blew him up in "Team America: World Police", an absolutely hilarious movie :).
 
Bravo to Sgt. Damon for doing the heroic thing a 2nd time. This time to stand up to a bully who's using him.

I agree a settlement is likely, but I wish the jury could render a "guilty" verdict on Moore.
 
Oh no you mean someone is going to take this man of the poor and common to court. Oh shame. I mean he is a multi millionare who lives in luxery in NYC. Oh what liberals do not understand. It is like the rich man in The Bible who asked how to get to heaven and Jesus told him to give away his riches and follow him. Michael and all rich liberals are like that man. Not that being rich is bad, wrong or a sin but if you are unwilling to give up what you hold most dear in this life then you are lost. How many uber rich Hollywood or any other ie Kerry rich liberal gives up their riches to do their so called Social Gospel action. I know. NOT ONE. I will believe their crap when I see them give up their millions, their many mansions and really live what they seem to preach. Oh no they belive in taxing everyone else. They already have theirs and Income Taxes do not affect them only the MIDDLE CLASS who they throw kisses to. It reminds me of people like Bill Gates SR. and Buffet who are aganist doing away with the death tax or are all for higner taxes. Go ahead and give your money to the government then and leave the rest of us alone. Then I might believe their crap. Pass a tax me more law and let them give away their riches as an example of true charity not STATE FORCED COERSION. Can anyone really imagine(hang your laundry out to dry) Streisand or Clooney living on 50,000 a year. HAHAHAHHAHAHHA?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
It is so tempting to go off on a tirade against that miscreant Michael Moore.
But being that this is the 'High Road' I will refrain.

But oh man, that guy is such a piece of you know what.
 
Opinion today in the Boston Herald.

Moore meets his match
By Boston Herald editorial staff
Friday, June 2, 2006

Good for Sgt. Peter Damon!
Damon, a National Guardsman from Middleborough, has filed an $85 million lawsuit against film-maker/propagandist Michael Moore, charging Moore used film clips of an interview he did with NBC without his permission - and distorted his message by including the clips in his anti-Bush screed, “Fahrenheit 9/11.”
Damon lost both arms during the Iraq war, when a Black Hawk helicopter he was servicing exploded on the ground. He was interviewed for a “Nightly News” segment on a new painkiller military doctors were using on the wounded. In the movie he is shown on a gurney, talking about his pain.
Damon says that by positioning his film clip just after that of Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.), talking about the Bush administration “leaving veterans behind” it implied he was among those being left behind.
“The work creates a substantially fictionalized and falsified implication as a wounded serviceman who was left behind when plaintiff was not left behind but supported, financially and emotionally, by the active assistance of the president, the United States and his family, friends, acquaintances and community,” Damon says in his suit.
Ordinarily we’re not huge fans of taking every dispute to court. But any lawsuit that attempts to show Moore for the pompous fraud he truly is surely deserves a hearing on the merits. And any man who would exploit and distort the words of a genuine American hero is beyond contempt.

JT
 
How Bowling for Columbine changed my life.

I have to say that I owe "Bowling for Columbine" for getting me more involved in guns than I was before. I first watched it as a naive 18 year old in 2002 as a documentary and expected it to be truthfull and honest. (I was young, I didn't know better.) I came out with an uneasy feeling. I felt (at the time) that he was giving a mixed message of pro and anti-gun feeling. I felt as if I had "missed something". I got a bootleg copy (Glad now that I never paid money for it.:rolleyes: ) and watched it again. I still had a feeling that I was "missing" something.

I started to look on the internet to try and find the "missing" info. I soon found what I was missing. The fabrication and BS that had been spun into this piece of propaganda was soon revealed to me. I thought, "If that is BS, then what else is?" I was always sceptical of things, even when I was young. I started to read both pro and anti arguments on the internet and soon started to find that the pro arguments where consistant and based on facts that could be verified where the anti arguments where based on emotion, hid the numbers, and tended to insult my intelligence. The anti arguments where easily debunked and the pro arguments layed the evidence before me so I could go and make sure that everything was correct.

I continued to read and learned alot about guns in the process. At the time I only owned a Marlin 22, I soon bought a 22-250 and then an SKS. (The joys of learning what cosmoline was.:p ) I enjoyed learning about guns as well as shooting them. I bought a reloading press and started reloading When I turned 21 I sent for my C&R and bought a handgun. I also joined forums like THR after lurking for several years. I owe alot of you older members for turning me into the informed person I am now. Now I have more guns than months of the year and enjoy taking them to the range as well as tinkering with them and reloading the ammo for them.

/Thanks Michael Moore for changing my life.:neener:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top