John Moses Browning came up with the external extractor and the 1911 came out with both the internal and the external extractor
And very few 1911's have external extractors as a percentage, to me external extractors have been utilized by some companies because it costs less to machine a slot in the side than to drill a long tunnel accurately, probably more of a cost saving due to less scrap. As a machinist I know the external extractor is much easier to get right. If you like them in a 1911 I hope you enjoy yours.
But I don't understand how anyone could like a HP more than a 1911, but if that's your choice, again, I hope you enjoy yours. I sold mine as soon as I disassembled it the first time and saw what was inside.
Taking apart a HP I realized how superior the 1911 was with it's symmetrically balanced trigger forces, and how poor mechanically the weird linkages of the HP are, to my way of thinking. Plus, the presence of the obnoxious magazine safety, (which liberals like to favor) that in itself would be enough for me.
But I think JMB may have been slightly diminished mentally if he designed that HP ignition system, and I know
why he had to go over the top and back down like that, but typically he found better engineering very quickly, I think possibly he just died too soon to get around to a better system.
To think otherwise implies that he accidentally designed the magnificent straight pull balanced trigger, and I suspect that he felt it was one of his finest moments.
But the difference between you and I may just be the fact that I'm a purist, I hate all the crap people attach to 1911's, they are beautiful as delivered commercially from the start.
I did find a forum thread where a poster said this;
"Browning appears to have developed the leaf spring extractor design for his locked breech handgun designs due to the vertical movement of the barrel breech during slide closure and opening. He wanted a wider extractor claw which would control the 'rim' of the cartridge during the full vertical iteration of the barrel breech. He apparently came to this conclusion after some difficulty with the Colt Model 1900 / 1902 extractor, which was a hybrid of the two different types." and this;
"It is worth noting that the original Browning Model 1935 High Power had an internal leaf spring extractor until the 1960's, when it was redesigned for a coil spring driven fulcrum extractor."
I've read forum posters saying Browning "Corrected" all the defects in the 1911 when he designed the HP, but we all know that other guy did much of the work, and if the HP was a correction it failed miserably based on what I saw inside a Belgian FN. The design was simply not up to
John Moses Browning standards of mechanical excellence, IMO.