I'm listening to NPR last night and on comes an essay about hunting. Eek! I think.
So the commentator reports how he went hunting for the first time in New England with two friend who describe themselves as armed liberals. They want to live off nature's bounty and not eat crap from the market. They acquaint the dude with shotgun usage and then go hunting for grouse. They comment on how walking through nature is neat and even if you don't get anything it is fun.
Then he shoots a grouse and feels bad for a minute. However, the grouse is cooked up and he regards it as one of the best meals ever. He says that it is hypocritical to attack hunting if you buy meat at the store and next year, he wants to go out for moose.
I've heard NPR to some legitimate and balanced gun stories over the past couple of years. Much more than the major networks. I've heard them interview progun women authors and objectively talk about the NRA's radio ventures. I'm sure that they have antis on and they might be outrageous but the major networks never do prostuff as well.
So the commentator reports how he went hunting for the first time in New England with two friend who describe themselves as armed liberals. They want to live off nature's bounty and not eat crap from the market. They acquaint the dude with shotgun usage and then go hunting for grouse. They comment on how walking through nature is neat and even if you don't get anything it is fun.
Then he shoots a grouse and feels bad for a minute. However, the grouse is cooked up and he regards it as one of the best meals ever. He says that it is hypocritical to attack hunting if you buy meat at the store and next year, he wants to go out for moose.
I've heard NPR to some legitimate and balanced gun stories over the past couple of years. Much more than the major networks. I've heard them interview progun women authors and objectively talk about the NRA's radio ventures. I'm sure that they have antis on and they might be outrageous but the major networks never do prostuff as well.