OMG! Tom Diaz (VPC) Is a HANDGUN OWNER!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Airwolf

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
630
Location
Southern PRK
http://www.boston.com/dailynews/046/region/It_s_big_it_s_bold_Gunmaker_un:.shtml

It's big, it's bold: Gunmaker unveils hefty .50-caliber revolver

By Trudy Tynan, Associated Press, 2/15/2003 13:50

SPRINGFIELD, Mass. (AP) Two years after being almost swept away in a backlash to its safety agreement with the Clinton administration, Springfield handgun maker Smith & Wesson is staking a claim on the market with its biggest weapon ever.

The company bills its new .50 caliber Magnum revolver, one of nine new models introduced this past week, as the ''most powerful production handgun on the market.''
Weighing more than 4½ pounds, or about a pound more than the big-frame .44 Magnum stopper in the Dirty Harry movies, the five-shot revolver is so powerful that it even has a built-in vent to release gasses and to help keep the 8½-inch barrel from swinging skyward when fired.

''It speaks to the pedigree the company has and its long tradition as an industry innovator,'' Roy C. Cuny, who took over as president and chief executive officer last month following the elevation of Robert Scott to chairman of the gun works, told The Associated Press.

It comes as the company seeks to rebound from slumping handgun sales after consumers upset by the company cut an agreement with the Clinton administration in 2000 to install safety locks on all of its guns and adopt other safety measures and marketing changes abandoned the longtime gunmaker.

Gun rights supporters had accused Smith & Wesson of selling out, some vowed to boycott the company, and Smith & Wesson's sales were cut nearly in half, the company has said.

Cuny, whose background is in manufacturing, said the new Model 500 builds on the .357 Magnum developed in the 1930s by Douglas B. Wesson, a grandson of one of the company's founders, to promote handgun hunting.
The new revolver, with a $989 price tag, has intrigued enthusiasts and outraged gun-control activists. But both sides say Smith & Wesson is taking dead aim at its core market.

''It's macabre,'' said Tom Diaz, an author and senior policy director of the Violence Policy Center. ''Lethality is the nicotine of the gun industry. It uses innovations and greater killing power to get customers. It's a sick market.''

Still, Diaz, a handgun owner, admitted his curiosity was aroused by the engineering.


Hunting aficionados are excited by the new product, say it could stir new interest to the sport of handgun hunting.

''It's a legitimate hunting gun,'' said Steve Comus, publications director of Safari Club International.

He said the new gun and cartridge create the first revolver powerful enough to stop the charge of a big game animal, and could also serve as a backup protection for fishermen and other outdoorsmen in areas frequented by grizzlies and other big predators.

''Obviously, they are not going to sell 100,000 of them, but they will sell several thousand to that particular universe,'' Comus said. ''And, just as important, this gun will get people talking about Smith & Wesson again.

''There is still some residual grumping around their deal with the Clinton administration in some gun circles,'' Comus said. ''This gives Smith & Wesson another chance to say we're not the same company now and gets them re-established.''

Founded by firearm pioneers Horace Smith and Daniel B. Wesson, the 150-year-old company has a long tradition as one of the nation's oldest and largest handgun makers. Its revolvers were used by sharpshooter Annie Oakley, outlaw Jesse James and the U.S. Cavalry, while its .38 caliber Police Special and .357 Magnum were carried by generations of police officers.

But it outraged many gun rights supporters in 2000, when faced with sliding sales and a raft of government lawsuits pushed by gun control advocates, it reached the agreement with the Clinton administration aimed at policing sales and promoting safety measures.
Distributors and dealers refused to stock Smith & Wesson guns. ''I think we saw our business probably decline 40 percent,'' said company spokesman Ken Jorgensen.

And in May 2001, British conglomerate Tomkins Plc, which had paid $113 million for the company, sold it for $15 million plus $30 million in assumed debts to Saf-T-Hammer Corp., a tiny startup in Arizona that made trigger locks.

Scott, a former Smith & Wesson vice president, who had moved to Saf-T-Hammer, took over the gun works. His first stop, two weeks after the sale, was the National Rifle Association's annual convention.

With banners and buttons promoting the company's return to American ownership, he quickly moved to make peace with the NRA.

''The turnaround was unbelievably dramatic,'' Jorgensen said. ''The problems were associated with our former owners.''

With President Bush's election, the political climate also changed and handgun sales soared following the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

''Without a change in ownership we would have been in deep trouble,'' Cuny said. ''The right-hand turn took us on a growth plan when we could have gone out of business.''

For the quarter ended Oct. 31, the company reported revenue of $23.5 million and net income of $252,000, compared to revenues of $19.9 million and a net loss of $426,000 in the previous year.

Saf-T-Hammer, which changed its name to the Smith & Wesson Holding Corp., has capitalized on the company's name by expanding its licensing to encompass a wide range of products from clothing to binoculars and golf clubs, a sideline that now accounts for 10 percent of its revenues. But the focus of its business remains guns.
However, the company, with about 650 workers at its Springfield plant and another 100 at a pistol and handcuff plant in Houlton, Maine, faces some tough challenges, Cuny said.

The lawsuits continue to be a drain on its resources. Competitors, primarily Glock, have made inroads on the handgun market for law enforcement. And the market remains cyclical and uncertain.

''The market for handguns is very much affected by the political climate,'' said Gary Mehalik, a spokesman for the National Shooting Sports Foundation, an industry trade group.

''It spiked after 9-11 and then dropped to a more usual levels,'' he said.

Still, shooters, like other sports enthusiasts, tend to have more than one gun. ''And like the tennis player with a closet full of rackets they are always looking for the newest and latest thing,'' he said.
 
Elitist swine would disarm us and yet keep his own guns. Let's send him to Saddam as a "human shield." Maybe he and the PETA folks can be martyrs to their cause.
 
*heh* kinda figured.

With the amount of technical detail he pours into those "exposes" of his, you just gotta know he's a not-so-closeted gun nut.

I mean really, the man reminds me of nothing so much as the loudly puritanical wanna-be minister who gets caught with a Lady of the Evening in his car and a pile of dirty magazines under his bed.

It's okay to come out of the closet Tom!!!!
:D


-K
 
No doubt he'll be on the "approved" list for gun ownership after the ban, along w/ feinswine and Spielberg, et al.
 
The one commonality for members of any group, which professes to be a guardian of;
The old
The young
The minorities
The public recourses
The public’s health
The public’s finances
The public’s well being
Is that they are ALL hypocrites.
:banghead: :cuss: :fire:
 
Oh wow! Really? This is a surprise?? My roomate is an employee of the FBI and he thinks I'm alittle over the top with my 14 Handguns, 4 rifles, and a shotgun. He believes only LE and Military should own firearms. He also believes that the Constitution is out-dated and needs to be changed to reflect today's society. :rolleyes: There is no end to the hypocrisy and elitism in this world.
 
Ban every handgun with a built-in vent to release gasses and to help keep the 8½-inch barrel from swinging skyward when fired.

Its for the children! :rolleyes: :barf:

Kharn
 
<Over the top Gomer Pyle imitation on>

Surprise, surprise, surprise

<Over the top Gomer Pyle imitation off>

Another example of statist logic:
"My life is more important to me than your life is important to you."

Has anyone email the URL to FoxNews?
 
I'll admit, I was shocked, for about two seconds.


Who wants to bet that he carries on a regular basis?

We should start calling up the VPC and haranguing them about the evils of handguns.
:evil:
 
Who wants to bet that he carries on a regular basis?

Wouldn't take that bet. Remember we've had that idiot Senator Perata who is a pathological grabber packing because (he claims) of "overt threats" by gun owners.

Think I'm kidding? (bottom of the linked page).

http://nrawinningteam.com/calnra/perata/

Those that work hardest to deny your rights ALWAYS think that they are exempt... ALWAYS!
 
What a hypocrite...

Diaz is one of the anti-firearm nutcases who thinks that we shouldn't be allowed to own/use handguns, but the VPC goes farther...they think that LE and military should be prohibited, too!

Their "lethality" argument is nothing new...it's simply recycled feces.

And they think that all gun shows should be banned; more illogic piled on top of emotion.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top