Perception versus Reality

Status
Not open for further replies.

Devonai

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2003
Messages
4,026
Location
Connecticut
I've been working second shift guarding a retail store in Lawrence, Massachusetts that got flooded out and is now being renovated. The neighborhood is supposedly rough but I haven't seen anything worse than kids setting off car alarms for kicks. It is an unarmed assignment but my boss allows the staff to carry if they're licensed. I have carried for New Hampshire assignments but I don't have my Massachusetts license yet.

I meant to apply for my MA carry permit back in March, but for a few months I was on activation notice for possible deployment to Iraq with the National Guard. When I found out I wasn't going, I submitted the license application. I will not receive the license before the end of the assignment (my last day there is Thursday), so the issue will quickly become academic in this case. I expect I will receive the license before my next MA assignment, however.

Last week I met a fellow employee for the first time when he relieved me. He asked me if I was carrying and expressed sympathy when I told him I was not. He asked me, "Do you feel safe?"

I laughed as this pertains to a recurring issue here on THR and in self-defense circles. Whether or not I feel safe is irrelevant, as perception is not reality. Being truly safe from outside threats involves being inside a defensible and relatively secure home or apartment. For us here that includes a firearm in case the threat circumvents our physical defenses. Once we step out on the street, "being safe" becomes a matter of preparedness and readiness reducing the odds against us. In a dynamic environment, however, it is impossible to eliminate all external threats.

It has been my experience that most people will not hesistate to agree with the statement, "You have a right to feel safe." Only slightly less ridiculous is the statement, "You have a right to be safe." We here on THR know that this is a fallacious position, as no one is ultimately responsible for your safety but you.

When I have this conversation with non-gunnies, I can always point out the problem with that supposed right, instead replacing the sentiment with, "You have a right to make yourself as safe as possible," with the obvious follow-on being, "You have a right to defend yourself." I like to point out that if one thinks they have the right to feel safe, to the point of legislation to back up that perception, aren't they just as paranoid as the "gun nuts" they ridicule?

I told my fellow security guard that I did not feel safe, but that I needed money and I was willing to risk my life to a greater degree to avoid late payments on loans, et cetera. If I did not feel safe enough, however, I would call my supervisor and tell him I wasn't interested in continuing the assignment. My threat assessment never got to that point. Even still, my perception may not equal reality as there could be a gang war boiling over as we speak that will take my life tonight. I will never know.

As far as those who would suggest carrying anyway, I was told flat-out by a Lawrence cop that he would not arrest me for carrying without a Massachusetts license as I had a New Hampshire permit and a NH security guard license. I asked him what if I had to fire my weapon to defend myself, and he said that would be a different story. I said, "Then what's the point?" I am completely confident that I could get away with carrying concealed from now until the cows come home, but I'm not willing to accept the inevitable arrest and prosecution that would come from a shooting no matter how justified. This is Massachusetts we're talking about.

How do you deal with people who think they have a right to feel safe? At what point would you turn down an assignment, were you unable to carry?
 
You'll see stuff start happening in Lawrence. I live in NH on the border and often go there. Just so you know how uptight they are, I was playing in a summer leauge for basketball at the courts behind the stadium, and a car backfired, and everybody hit the ground (in the middle of the game).... You want to be careful in a place where everybody is familiar with the hit the ground drill. I've also painted houses there and I was constantly watching my back. Too bad I was only 17 at the time and couldn't carry anything for defense. I strongly reccomend you carry. The house I was painting had been broken into multiple times, a relative's house.
 
Last edited:
No one has a "right" to feel safe. You have a right to speak your mind, a right to gather, a right to publish whatever you want, a right to defend yourself, etc. You have a right to do things, but the right to feel safe is as silly as it is intellectually lame. It is a condition and not an action.
 
So I don't have the right to warm fuzzies either? Bummer.

I have never heard the concept of a "right to feel safe" except in documentaries that pertain to victim support groups and they talk about being "empowered" by their experiences.

Perception and reality are big concepts are may or may not actually match one another. So when do you decline a job? When your perception of danger is verified in some manner you feel is beyond your ability to handle. I grew up working in one of the worst parts of Dallas in a family business and road my bike to work after school. Once I learned the neighborhood, I felt as comfortable there as in my home neighborhood and actually had less problems there than in the home neighborhood, but crime statistics indicated my home neighborhood was much safer.

If being armed with a gun is your only ability to defend yourself, then you should rethink guard duty.
 
Well, I'd assume what the client would like is for you to be wandering around as a visible deterrent, and then for you to run like blazes and dial 911 at the first sign of trouble if that dosen't work, so "fast shoes" are your first line of defense. It's a bad situation, and if you get to feeling that it's too creepy, call dispatch and book off. Like right now for your shift tomorrow; they love that. ;)
 
I was told flat-out by a Lawrence cop that he would not arrest me for carrying without a Massachusetts license as I had a New Hampshire permit and a NH security guard license. I asked him what if I had to fire my weapon to defend myself, and he said that would be a different story. I said, "Then what's the point?" I am completely confident that I could get away with carrying concealed from now until the cows come home, but I'm not willing to accept the inevitable arrest and prosecution that would come from a shooting no matter how justified.

The point is that if you have to fire your weapon to defend yourself then you must have been in a situation in which you felt your life was at risk. Arrest and prosecution would suck but going home in a body bag would suck more.

I'm not recommending you violate the law, just pointing out that staying alive would be the point of carrying anyway.
 
If it bugs you enough to not "carry", then I'd suggest some MA-compliant non-concealed carry. Perhaps slow to deploy but better than nothing. Plus, the after-action reports I hear frequently include some signs of trouble brewing which eliminate the need for a quick draw.

I'm glad no one has suggested "Who would tell if you drew from concealment?" Well, that "solution" depends on too many loose variables. 1. The BG you shot cannot ever communicate again. 2. No other witnesses--HAH! There's always a witness (real or fabricated--and how do you explain that IWB rig?). 3. You must not only lie, but lie with credibility. Wanna try passing a voice stress analysis test? I've never seen anyone beat that box (though I suspect a few stressful topics/questions may have showed "lie" when the answer really was true). 4. Physical evidence you never dreamed of could prove you a liar.

You NEVER want to face the famous prosecutor's question after proving you changed your story: "Were you lying THEN, or are you lying NOW?"

If local law allows, a pistol zipped in a nice bookbag or other "case", slide locked open and your mags in your back pocket wedged on either side of the wallet to keep then upright, can still be deployed with decent speed.

Beats the heck out of wishing you could make it to the trunk of your car or the cab of your truck. Luby's cafeteria in TX proved that, to the tune of an awful body count.
 
I should have mentioned that I'm working out of my Ford Ranger, so I have escape options.

I also have other legal non-firearm weapons. Mace is not one of them as a firearms permit is necessary for it (same license, different reason for issue). I carry a Benchmade folder for trips to the 7-11 or the "bathroom" (alleyway), and next to me in the truck sits a three-foot length of red oak (bokken). The latter will protect me against any number of attackers as long as they don't have firearms. But my perception of my skill may not be reality.

I don't see the point in carrying a locked and unloaded pistol in my truck. One, Massachusetts law forbids it unless you are passing through the state or on your way to a private residence where the owner has a license to carry. Two, people come up to me at least three times a shift asking for money or cigarettes. If one of them wanted to shoot me, only a ready pistol concealed on my person and some luck will save me.

I should clarify one of my original points. I do not fear arrest and prosecution. I fear the inevitable conviction that would follow. Even if it's only a one year suspended sentence, I'm still a convicted felon, broke, and my career is over. Worse than that, I'd be dishonorably discharged from the Army. Sure, I'd still be alive, but what kind of life would it be? Hence my decision not to carry until the license shows up.
 
Do we have the right to feel safe?

That's a tough one. hso brough up a good point when he said that safe was a condition, not an action. But the actions that we take, arming ourselves for example, are to make us feel safe.

Our actions that are rights result in conditions. Our conditions make us chose what actions we take to correct them.

If we don't feel safe, we have the right to lock our doors, arm ourselves, or build a bomb bunker in our basement if we chose.

It doesn't make sense to say you have the right to do what you want to make yourself feel safe, but you don't have the right to be safe. I think we do have the right to feel safe.
 
Blissninnies

Only an absolute blissninny could think there's a right "feel" safe. They'll talk about it, but if questioned about how that right should extend into the ghetto, they'd then say that's stupid. Their right to feel safe only applies when law abiding citizens are around. Of course this "right" is only a restriction on the law abiding...

Law abiding armed citizens don't have rights around the economically disadvantaged or protected blissninnies...
 
You can pursue safety all you want, but you don't have a right to get or stay in that condition, any more than you have a "right" to health. You just have the right to pursue that goal.

-James
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top