Pilots' gun class nears graduation

Status
Not open for further replies.

PenHolder

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2003
Messages
65
Location
Californistan
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/04/17/pilots.guns.ap/index.html

GLYNCO, Georgia (AP) -- Only two of the 48 commercial airline pilots in the first class being trained to carry guns in the cockpit failed to make it through the early days of a rigorous course at a federal facility.

More of the pilots may wash out by Saturday, when those who pass the course are sworn in as federal flight deck officers under a program approved by Congress.

"These drills are tough, are hard, are good," said Capt. Steve Luckey, a retired pilot who is chairman of the Air Line Pilots Association's national security committee.

Luckey, who lobbied hard to let pilots have guns, came to the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center to watch sweaty, bruised and bleeding pilots practice how to fend off an armed attacker. The center trains agents and officers for some 70 federal agencies.

Luckey and other pilots say they are delighted with the training developed by the Bush administration, which at first opposed arming pilots as potentially dangerous and disruptive -- reasons also cited by the airlines.

The Transportation Security Administration, which runs the course, would not say why the two pilots did not make the grade.

Agency spokesman Robert Johnson gave some examples of how pilots could fail: not finishing the training or passing psychological tests that might indicate a pilot would have trouble killing another person.

Luckey described the course, which began Monday, as learning to fight and shoot in the confines of a cockpit, which he likened to a phone booth.

Ivan Kalister, who heads the agency's specialized training, said the pilots are excellent students. "If we give them the basic tools, they will be able to respond well if they're attacked," he said.

Some pilots had blisters on their trigger fingers from shooting 8,000 rounds from their semiautomatic pistols Wednesday night. Most had at least a cut, bruise or lump from one-on-one exercises in hitting and grappling with play-acting terrorists.

Many of the pilots chosen for the program are familiar with guns because they had worked in law enforcement or the military. But some were picked because they were unfamiliar with guns.

The government decided on men and women of a variety of ages, backgrounds and sizes to put the training itself to a test. The next class is set for July.

The number of pilots certified to carry guns will depend on pilots' interest and the money available for training.

Capt. Fred Bates, an American Airlines pilot who helped put the program in place, said as many as a third of U.S. pilots -- about 30,000 -- could be carrying weapons on the flight deck in five years.

Their airline may not know they are training to carry a gun because failing could affect their job. Once they are sworn in, they will have to tell their employers, but they will not be required to fly with a weapon every time they get in the cockpit.

Already, pilots are wanting to change a rule that they must store their weapons in a locked case when they leave the cockpit, even to use the restroom.

---------------

<whine>Oh when will we learn, putting more guns in the sky is not an answer!</whine>

Seriously, though, despite all of the bitter foot-dragging from the various Administrativa (with a former BATF head running the TSA, no less), I'm happy to see this coming to term.

There are predictions of "blood on the streets" (or skies, in this case) every time we try to expand carry rights the teeniest bit; it really gets on one's nerves after a while. It's like listening to Baghdad Bob, but without the entertainment factor.

-PH
 
Copy of the letter I sent to the TSA.

To Whom It May Concern,
Why does it seem to me that you are making it harder for pilots to be armed? They are already entrusted with the lives of many on an everyday basis. They don't need additional psych. tests or people making it harder for them to be more effective in their duty to protect their passengers. The more hoops you place in front of them, the more likely it becomes that something will happen in the interim that not only endangers or costs lives, but more severly damages the TSA's reputation.
Please, for the safety of all flying Americans, light a fire under it and let's get moving on this problem. I, for one, will not fly until this basic and easily completed measure is in place. Who knows, you all may get to play the role of heroes by helping to save lives.

Sincerely,
:banghead:

But... Do the know what the term "light a fire under it" means?
BTW - haven't had a reason to fly either.
 
Lets see, this is a response to 9/11? Was that 9/11/01 ?
Didn't we fight a war over that?
Is this too little too late or what?
 
Luckey and other pilots say they are delighted with the training developed by the Bush administration, which at first opposed arming pilots as potentially dangerous and disruptive -- reasons also cited by the airlines.
It's amazing what can be accomplished when Norm Maneta took a hike.
Agency spokesman Robert Johnson gave some examples of how pilots could fail: not finishing the training or passing psychological tests that might indicate a pilot would have trouble killing another person.
Reality is breaking out all over! I demand to know who infect the TSA with a reality virus.
Ivan Kalister, who heads the agency's specialized training, said the pilots are excellent students. "If we give them the basic tools, they will be able to respond well if they're attacked," he said.
Ding, Ding, Ding, Ding. We have a brain.
Some pilots had blisters on their trigger fingers from shooting 8,000 rounds from their semiautomatic pistols Wednesday night. Most had at least a cut, bruise or lump from one-on-one exercises in hitting and grappling with play-acting terrorists.
8,000 rounds for one class! In one night?
The number of pilots certified to carry guns will depend on pilots' interest and the money available for training.
Pilot interest is valid. There should be no shortage of money for the program. Sounds like there are still Maneta holdovers in the woodpile.
Their airline may not know they are training to carry a gun because failing could affect their job. Once they are sworn in, they will have to tell their employers, but they will not be required to fly with a weapon every time they get in the cockpit.
Maybe the TSA needs to require airline management to go through the course. No pilot should jeopardize his job because he want to take a reasonable, logical, and proper action.

Pretty positive article from AP.
 
Waitone:
It's amazing what can be accomplished when Norm Maneta took a hike.
Mineta's still there :mad: it's John Magaw who "quit."

Reality is breaking out all over! I demand to know who infect the TSA with a reality virus.
It seems to have started when Admiral Loy took over from Magaw...


While I am disappointed that the program is set with such a high bar--simply doing the training ONLY at FLTC has that effect--I feel that it's better to do SOMETHING than to let the sheeple prevent ANYTHING from being done. And since the program pretty much demands that the pilots be deputized Feds--would they be able to land at, say Chicago O'Hare or Midway otherwise?--I'm not sure that they COULD be trained anywhere else.
 
They showed the class of armed pilots in training last night on TV without showing their faces. A bunch of rickety, old white haired men (and women too) standing wobbly legged 7 yards away from a silouette target. Drawing like the gun was too hot to touch, and then shooting a six inch group. One guy was complaining about how sore his hands were from "loading all those bullets". And, they said, they will be packing as soon as this Sunday. Nothing like a rigorous training course in defensive firearms skills... that runs three days. God help us all. I never thought it would happen, but the FAA pulled it off. rather than mandate actual security changes and armed (and trained) sky marshalls which would cost money, they are sending pilots to a three day school, handing them Glocks, and saying: "Look! We made flying safe again!" May God have mercy on us.
 
I feel this is a very wise move and hopfully will deter any future would be hijackers. I feel if a person is responsible enough to fly a commercial airliner then why can't they have a gun in the cockpit to protect that airliner? I think that one need to look at the isrealies they have armed personal on every one of thair commercial flights and armed pilots as well,so when is the last time an isreali airliner was hijacked? See my point?

I was watching a report on abc world news tonight last night about this and the narrator asked "Would you feel safe flying with a gun in the cockpit?" my reply is yes ofcourse I'd feel safer if anything. Lets face it every time you get on plane your putting you life in the hands of those pilots they are capable responsible people or they woulden't have the job they do. I'am a realist guys I don't feel this is a bad move I feel its long overdue infact and the horrible cowerdly action of september 11th 2001 showed us this.

Consider this what if the pilots of those planes were armed the outcome might have been differant ofcourse we will never know now but we can prevent it from happening again by taking this new measure,thats the whole point isn't it? I mean I know about the air marshals and all But lord forbid they don't get the job done the idea of arming pilots is the last line of defense. I've heard people say on the news what if a stray bullet hits a passanger? That would be awful but the result is worse if god forbid a hijacker gets control of the plane.

I mean the media talks like theres a half dozen air marshals on every flight we can only wish that was the case. But even if there where its about a last line of defense and the pilots have that right like any other good citizen.
 
Rickety, white haired? Sounds like some sour grapes. Would it be OK if they all looked like 25 year old Schwartzenagers?

You want teenagers flying YOUR airplane?
 
I'd rather see the firearms training more stringent than the psych/personality exams. They already have lives in their hands. Anyone know the training regimen? FBI in 3 days? Doesn't sound right. Lots of tight spots in commercial airliners ... CQB is the regimen they need with emphasis on retention drills. Not to second guess, but better training = more competent/confident.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top