Please read this!

Status
Not open for further replies.

tpaw

Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2007
Messages
787
Is this BS or not?

While you were watching the oil spill, the New York failed terrorist bombing and other critical crises, Hillary Clinton signed the small arms treaty with the UN.



OBAMA FINDS LEGAL WAY AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT

AND USES IT. IF THIS PASSES, THERE could BE WAR


On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a

Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States


On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States . The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms. The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened.


Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment. This has happened in other countries, past and present!

THIS IS NOT A JOKE NOR A FALSE WARNING.

As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control. Read the Article U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto. The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better. View The Full Article Here


Click on the link below for further acknowledgement…..

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015
 
THIS IS NOT A JOKE NOR A FALSE WARNING.

Actually it is both.

Bill Clinton signed the treaty actually, and it has never been ratified by the Senate. And, it was not a UN treaty, it was a North American treaty (Mexico mainly).

You don't sign "treaties" with the UN, you sign "resolutions". Some are binding resolutions, some are not.

Pretty much everything in that is wrong.....
 
When you click that link, look just under the title on the right. See the date? October 14, 2009.

When are people going to start looking at these things critically before reacting? :banghead:

Sure, this is a serious situation that will take us staying on top of things, but nothing is imminent. Even the article summary says "[the US]...would back launching talks on a treaty..."

What Hillary did was say "OK, lets talk about talking about doing something about this treaty."
 
:banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead:

Closed, for the umpteenth time.

Please folks, try to keep up with the times. Your email isn't the portal to the newest and best news about the RKBA, believe it or not.

:banghead:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top