Regional bank to refuse loans in eminent domain projects

Status
Not open for further replies.

Waitone

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
5,406
Location
The Land of Broccoli and Fingernails
Regional bank to refuse loans in eminent domain projects

http://www.wfsb.com/Global/story.asp?S=4409222

CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- Regional bank BB and T Corp., one of the nation's largest financial institutions, will make no loans to developers who plan to build commercial projects on land taken from private citizens by the government through the power of eminent domain, the company said Wednesday.

"The idea that a citizen's property can be taken by the government solely for private use is extremely misguided, in fact it's just plain wrong," John Allison, the bank's chairman and chief executive, said in a statement.

In an interview, BB and T chief credit officer Ken Chalk said the bank expects to lose only a tiny amount of business, but believes it was obligated to take a stance on the issue.

"It's not even a fraction of a percent," he said. "The dollar amount is insignificant."

But he added: "We do business with a large number of consumers and small businesses in our footprint. We are hearing from clients that this is an important philosophical issue."

Chalk said he knows of no other large U.S. bank with a similar policy.

BB and T, which is headquartered in Winston-Salem, ranks among the nation's top 10 banks by assets.

In June, a divided Supreme Court ruled that cities may raze people's homes to make way for shopping malls or other private development. The 5-4 decision gave local governments the power to seize private property in the name of increased tax revenue.

The ruling upheld a decision by the City of New London, Conn., to seize seven property owners' land so developers could build a hotel and high-end condominiums to keep pharmaceutical giant Pfizer expanding in the state.

Scott Bullock, a senior attorney with the Arlington, Va.-based Institute of Justice, who represented homeowners in the New London case, applauded the bank's decision.

"Eminent domain abuse is wrong and unconstitutional," Bullock said in a statement. "BB and T has stepped up and recognized its corporate responsibility to not be a part of this shameful abuse of individual rights."

The policy also will protect the assets of banks such as BB and T by not tying up their money in projects that may draw political opposition, said Columbia University law professor Thomas Merrill, a specialist on eminent domain.

Merrill added that he did not believe there were many cases similar to the one that developed in New London.

"No one knows how many of these projects are out there because the data is flimsy," he said. "But my hunch, from what data we do have, is that the number is relatively small and concentrated in large congested cities like New York, Boston or Baltimore."

In its statement, BB and T said 38 states have recently passed or are considering laws to ban the use of eminent domain for private development. Similar legislation is pending before the U.S. Congress.

"While we're certainly optimistic about the pending legislation, this is something we could not wait any longer to address," Chalk said in a statement. "We're a company where our values dictate our decision-making and operating standards. From that standpoint, this was a straightforward decision; it's simply the right thing to do."

BB and T, with $109 billion in assets, operates more than 1,400 branches in 11 states and Washington, D.C.
 
The policy also will protect the assets of banks such as BB and T by not tying up their money in projects that may draw political opposition, said Columbia University law professor Thomas Merrill, a specialist on eminent domain.
Ahh... The free market at work.:)
 
"While we're certainly optimistic about the pending legislation, this is something we could not wait any longer to address," Chalk said in a statement. "We're a company where our values dictate our decision-making and operating standards. From that standpoint, this was a straightforward decision; it's simply the right thing to do."

+1, Damn Right
 
Thefabulousfink said:
"While we're certainly optimistic about the pending legislation, this is something we could not wait any longer to address," Chalk said in a statement. "We're a company where our values dictate our decision-making and operating standards. From that standpoint, this was a straightforward decision; it's simply the right thing to do."

+1, Damn Right!

Exactly!!
+1
 
Ha, I like it. I just emailed bank of america to ask them what they're doing.

my email to BOA--------------------

I read with interest the article at the following link:

http://www.wfsb.com/Global/story.asp?S=4409222

regarding BB and T's decision not to write loans in support of commercial projects, that utilize eminent domain to obtain their property.

As a customer of your bank I am very interested in hearing Bank of America's position on this issue.

I strongly feel that the expansion of eminent domain powers as allowed by the Supreme Court is a terrible blow to private property rights in this country.

If your company has not yet formulated a position on this issue, I encourage you to join with BB and T in refusing to participate in and profit from this form of legalized theft.

Knowing your position on this matter will assist me in deciding whether or not to remain your customer in the future.

I look forward to your reply

Thank you
 
This is close to banker nirvanha - a good public relations ploy that does not really change the bank's business.
 
BB&T was our bank in NC for several years. Finest bank I ever used. Friendly people and great service. Sadly, when we moved, there was no branch near us, but they were moving into our area. Gotta check again.:)
 
We are hearing from clients that this is an important philosophical issue.

How come bankers can hear better than Jorge Bush and his people in Washington, D.C.? Heck, Jorge and friends even have N.S.A. listening in on telephone conversations, don't they? How could they possibly miss this?
 
Gunpacker said:
BB&T was our bank in NC for several years. Finest bank I ever used. Friendly people and great service. Sadly, when we moved, there was no branch near us, but they were moving into our area. Gotta check again.:)

Of course, no company is perfect. VCDL has labeled BB&T as gun owner-unfriendly--apparently they have posted all of their Virginia branches against carry.

Just something to consider.
 
I'm already a customer of B&T. Been so for the last 13 years. I'm proud of 'em.
Before you get all warm & fuzzy with BB&T, note that they prohibit armed customers from their premises, despite numerous requests to honor VA CCW permits.

BTW, their small facilities have recently been disproportionately the targets of armed robbers. Correlation you think? :evil:

TC
 
Waitone said:
In an interview, BB and T chief credit officer Ken Chalk said the bank expects to lose only a tiny amount of business, but believes it was obligated to take a stance on the issue.

"It's not even a fraction of a percent," he said. "The dollar amount is insignificant."

...and that's why they're doing it. They lose an "insignificant" amount of business, but get to trumpet what "good guys" they are, and hopefully draw more business.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top