Reloading Manuals, Any Recommendations?

Status
Not open for further replies.

PowderKeg

Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2005
Messages
47
Location
Ft Knox, KY
Getting back to shooting/reloading after a several year hiatus, and a quick check of my manual library to current offerings shows that I'm behind by about 2 editions or more. I'll most likely pick up the latest Lyman manual as well as a Hogdon, and maybe a caliber specific Loadbook or two, but I'm wondering what else might be out there that's well regarded (and current) but not a specific powder/bullet supplier-related manual.

I'd like to have about 3 or 4 different manuals to cross-check loads. Will be loading the gamut from .40 S&W, 10mm, .38/.357, .308, & .30-30 (for now)

Any thoughts?

GP
 
Powder - get all you can!!!

Lyman, Speer, Lee, Hornady, Accurate - many have on line PDF's too.

Don't go for just one - survey all - extrapolate, study and play safe.

The whole deal is fraught with problems if you take every word as gospel. Not to say you'll blow up a gun but - analyze and read all. Diversity with reloading is - IMO - good news!!
 
I agree with P95Carry...

The more, the better...

I'd start with Hornady 6 (because it has a lot of cartridges less easy to find in some other manuals), then Lee 2nd, then Speer 13, then whatever I could find, both current and old versions...
 
Don't look for the biggest baddest load in the collection, look for agreement between the books.
The more books you have, the more likely you'll find agreement on a powder/bullet combination.
Got a printer that works?
I know hodgdon and alliant have good data on their websites, as well as steve's pages, and several other resources.
Definately get the hornady, hodgdon, and speer books, too.
 
Hornady, Speer, Sierra, Ackley, and Nosler are all good to have.

I know that just those books probably come close to 120 bucks, but they are all worth it. As has been said before, you cannot have enough data...sift and find that middle ground...I don't list Ackleys Reloader books due to his data being somewhat out of date, but he still has a wealth of data in his two volume set.

Darrell
 
The Hodgdon manual which you said you already planned to get is a good one. It has load data for Hodgdon powders of course, but it also has max load data for several other brands of powder as well. :)
 
I get all the free ones I can get, in addition the Hodgdon manual which is like a magazine and the Speer manual.

A lot of the powder companies have loading info online and several have down loadable loading manuals on Adobe Acrobat files.
 
The Sierra manual is great for rifles. The Nosler manual is very entertaining, and the hornady and speer have a lot of combos for each load.
 
Speer is my favorite (No. 13). Its the only one I read for enjoyment. The writing is very good, and the loads are good, too.
 
The best manual is the Lee 2nd edition as it has the most cartridges and loads per cartridge of any manual printed. It is not really bullet specific but some data is listed for specific bullets such as the Barnes X bullet and Hornady XTP. But most of the data is listed just by bullet type(lead or jacketed) and bullet weight. Lee did no testing but compiled the published data from all suppliers of powder into one manual.
 
This question comes up enough and is important enough that I vote for making it a Sticky.

I'm a firm believer in having lots of manuals and cross checking them. If I could only have one, it would probably be the Lyman. I actually just got the Lee manual for the first time a couple of months ago, and I echo JA -- big fat manual with lots of neat stuff in it, and quite inexpensive.
 
Fella's;

I'm in agreement with most of you. Get several manuals, more information is better than less information. With that being said, I'll also note a couple of excellent sources that I haven't seen mentioned above.

The NRA Handloader's guide. And Barne's Cartridges Of The World.

I'm somewhat bemused by Powderkeg's requirement that the information NOT be specific to a bullet or powder manufacturer. Many of the sources listed above, such as Speer, Hornady, and Nosler, are truly excellent reference guides to the reloader. The cross-checking between them can supply a person with some real eye-opening information. For instance; Both Speer & Hornady publish their data as being obtained from real firearms & list what the loads were developed in. Nosler, on the other hand, uses test barrels to derive their data. What may at first appear to be inconsistant load data between the manuals can usually be resolved simply by recognizing, & allowing for, the differences in the testing media.

I got caught up in that sorta thing many years ago, thinking that Speer had wussed out on .357 magnum loads from one manual edition to the next. Then, it was pointed out to me that I should also be looking at the guns the loads were tested in, in the two editions. The light dawned. Said light being supplied by the redness in my face.

900F
 
Reloading manuals

Thanks ya'll for the comments so far.

As far as my reasons for wanting info on data sources other than specific powder & bullet manufacturers, there are several:

1 - I'm already reasonably confident they (manuf.) provide accurate and reliable data for their particular and specific product usage, so a recommendation is somewhat unnecessary. If I find myself consistently using a particular bullet or powder, then I'll aquire one of their manuals. I already have some older maker-specific manuals that I can cross ref. with a couple new broader manuals to be sure I'm still in the safe zone.

2 - I'm not overly allied to any particular bullet or powder maker (well except maybe Hodgdon) at this time, so re-investing in several maker-specific manuals would most likely cost me more to end up with similarly broad data coverage as a couple of non maker-allied manuals. And as pointed out, several manufacturers provide data online, so there is additional data out there available at low/no cost.

3 - I've seen/heard of some other titles out there in the past, but couldn't remember them to ask specifically about their quality/content. The Lee manual is one that I didn't know about, but sounds like one I'll want to look at to add to the library. The Ackley set is another one (although I believe they're pricey?) I don't have any experience with. The Loadbook caliber-specific ones I've known about but never really looked at before.

4 - I'm one that likes to see data in black and white, and not guesstimate by cutting roughly 10% or more off max loads to find a starting load, or a % off jacketed bullet data to substitute lead bullets, or other such methods. I don't have a chrony (yet) either, so I stay conservative with loads and don't push the max loadings. Another reason I like manuals that specify a min/max range of powder weights for a variety of powders, not just a max.

5 - I'm out here in the boondocks of SE Virginia, where a decently stocked gun/reloading shop is way over an hour+ away, so simply dropping by and checking out the latest manuals is difficult for me. And there's no guarantee that any particular shop will have all the different ones to compare/contrast with before buying. Mail order or a gun show (also well over 1 hour, when they're held) are the primary methods for getting reloading supplies.


I've got 5 bound manuals right now from the late 80's/early 90's - Lyman, Accurate, Hodgdon, Hornady, and Sierra (in the binder) - along with some freebie handouts from a few other powder makers. I prefer using lead pistol bullets over jacketed because of the cost. Only 2 of those manuals list any load data for lead bullets in .40 S&W/10mm - the Lyman and the Accurate #1. The Accurate book only lists Accurate powders, so now I'm down to one manual (the Lyman) for any load info using 231, Bullseye, Unique, whatever. Since I'm already planning on picking up the latest Lyman (#48), I'd like to get at least a second and hopefully a third manual with very broad coverage (like the Lyman), so that I've got a couple of sources to cross ref. for a wider selection of bullet/powder combinations. It's not my intention to ignore or downplay the value of the maker-specific manuals, it's just that the ones I presently have don't help as much as I'd like for some of my reloading data needs. If they don't list lead bullet data because they don't make/sell non-jacketed lead bullets, then there's nothing in black & white to cross ref with.

And I agree wholeheartedly, having 3 or more good (and hopefully current) manuals to cross ref with is a requirement (IMHO) for safe and efficient reloading.

Sounds like the best options for me are the latest Lyman and Lee books, along with an updated Hodgdon and maybe a Loadbook or two. I also like my old Accurate #1 book, since it lists specific loads for High Power Service Rifle for my .308 re-barrelled Garand, and I hope to pick up a CMP Garand someday as well.

Thanks!

GP
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top