Remington 9mm 147gr JHP HTP in Clear Ballistics Gel

Status
Not open for further replies.

5pins

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2003
Messages
240
Q5YMsnLl.jpg

Test Gun: Sig P229, Beretta Nano.
Barrel length: 3.9, 3 inches.
Ammunition: Remington 147gr JHP High Terminal Performance
Test media: 10% Clear Ballistics Gel.
Distance: 10 feet.
Chronograph: Caldwell Ballistic Precision Chronograph G2.
Five shot velocity average: 895, 868fps
Gel Temperature 70 degrees.

Number ten and the last of the budget 9 stuff for a while. I'm not going to test the Geco Hexagon round. If I had of done some research before buying it, I would have noticed it wasn't intended as a self-defense round. This one is the Remington 147gr JHP High Terminal Performance round. It cost $15.99 for a 50 round box but is currently $14.99 from Target Sports.



I handloaded this bullet early on when I started testing and had the same results. I only bought this ammo to see if the factory loaded stuff was the same bullet they were selling to handloaders. Turns out it is and performs just as poorly and I was pushing my handload at around 1000fps IIRC.



I got a five shot average velocity of 895fps from the Sig with a high of 905fps and a low of 885fps.

SQtLCY0l.jpg
Ten yards off hand five shots with the Sig P229

From the Beretta Nano, I got a five shot velocity of 868fps with a high of 888fps and a low of 859fps.

3XtjeQxl.jpg
Ten yards off hand five shots with the Beretta Nano

This part is going to be short. I fired two rounds from the Sig 229 in bare gel and both failed to expand. The velocity of the two rounds was 900fps and 902fps and penetration of 22.75 inches and 23.25 inches.

4DCUvDll.jpg
 
Doesn't appear to match Winchesters version of a cheap 147gr jhp. Better move up to Golden Sabers at least.
 
Yeesh, garbage! Might as well load up $8.99 FMJ to get that performance.

I wonder if a PC or AR 9 with a 16” barrel would speed it up enough to expand?

Stay safe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top