Ruger Black Hawk 357

Status
Not open for further replies.
I got a brand-spankin' new 6.5" NM Blackhawk .357Mag last year in May. As I mentioned in another thread, it has the smoothest unmodified action of any SA revolver I have yet handled. It is very accurate, out to 50yds so far. Next time I take it out I plan to shoot for 100. I have put roughly 200 rounds through mine, both .357 and .38, and accuracy doesn't vary with any commercial loading I've tried yet. The .38s generate so little recoil it's almost like shooting .22LR out of a Single-Six. I only wish I had known a convertible Blackhawk existed, 'cause that would be even more awesome for post-apocalyptic shenanigans. I wonder If I could get Ruger to make me a 9x19 cylinder?

"It is my most favorite (hand) gun."
 
Blackhawks are like sex the worst experiance I ever had was great and they're about as reliable as a Eastwing hammer.
 
I got a brand-spankin' new 6.5" NM Blackhawk .357Mag last year in May. As I mentioned in another thread, it has the smoothest unmodified action of any SA revolver I have yet handled. It is very accurate, out to 50yds so far. Next time I take it out I plan to shoot for 100. I have put roughly 200 rounds through mine, both .357 and .38, and accuracy doesn't vary with any commercial loading I've tried yet. The .38s generate so little recoil it's almost like shooting .22LR out of a Single-Six. I only wish I had known a convertible Blackhawk existed, 'cause that would be even more awesome for post-apocalyptic shenanigans. I wonder If I could get Ruger to make me a 9x19 cylinder?
Let me tell you, I ordered my 45 colt Blackhawk having never fired or handled one before. I was in love with the hot rodded 45 colt(and still am). Out of the box it had a 3.6lb trigger pull. I was flabbergasted as I had heard of how bad ruger triggers were(this was my first ruger of any kind). I read about the "poor boys trigger job" on the net and decided to try it. On the same pull gauge, a very nice one owned by the local gunshop owner/gunsmith registed a repeated average of 2lbs 13oz. Not too darned shabby for a cheap single action, at least in my opinion.
 
Brand new out of the box the NMBH convertible I got last week has a consistent 3.2 lb trigger pull... Just a hair of creep as the transfer bar rises, but predictable & not gritty.
 
Okay I will be the one voice of dissent. I had a BH convertible and shot it for about half a year. I shot lots of reduced lead 9mm loads at turtles in my buddies pond. The gun was accurate enough for any handgun work I would have needed it for. There is no question about the strength of the gun. It can take if you can. But I never hot rod loads anyway. If I need more power I just use a bigger gun.

The only thing I didn't like about it and is the sole reason I sold the gun was that it just seemed too big of a gun for the 357 round. I didn't like the weight or the barrel heavyness with the small factory grip.

This thread has made me wonder if I made a mistake selling the gun. I do like the idea of the smaller anniversery model though. The option of shooting a 9mm out of it is not a big selling point to me.
 
The large frame New Model is too much sixgun for the cartridge. The mid-frame Old Models and the 50th anniversary flat-top are much better suited to the .357Mag chambering. While the 50th version is just as heavy, it does feel and balance much better and I greatly prefer the XR3/Colt SAA/Navy pattern grip frame over the XR3-RED. Though the difference will be very subtle to many shooters.
 
I have a 357 Blackhawk from the first year of manufacture. I'm the third owner. God only knows how many rounds went through it before I got it and I've put several thousand down range with it. The bore is immaculate and it locks uo tight. I have a 50th Anniversary model as well. Accuracy is better than I can shoot on both of them.

I don't put the heaviest 357 loads through them, just standard power 357s and plenty of 38 specials. If I want absolute full house 357 mag loads I use my Redhawk or a T/C Contender.

If you manage to wear one out, let us know. You would be part of a VERY small group. ;)

Jeff
 
I traded into a used stainless 6.5" .357 BH, and I'll never part with it. It's more accurate than I'll ever be and I don't think I'll ever be able to wear it out.

Yes it is heavy, but it just shoots so dang nice:)
 
And FA's best platform for the .357 is the little model 97, which is actually a touch smaller than a Colt SAA.
 
Served me well since about 2003. Around 15,000 rounds a year. Owned by one of the best cowboy gunsmith around, Cody Conagher. Sold to Lone Dude, a past top shooter in NC. Bought them from Lone Dude and they are small tanks. I had to replace one trigger return sping in all this time. I do shoot light loads but the way cowboy is shot they take a beating.

Ruger3screwsknife002.gif
 
Bought mine new in 1968 and it's a great shooter, 7.5" barrel and it cleans up nice.
 
Post 21 by CraigC is quite a statement. I hope he is right.

If he ain't right, he ain't far from wrong. The Blackhawks are tough handguns, accurate, and compared to a DA gun they're simple. No crane, and assorted hardware for cylinder release. I really prefer single actions for outdoor use and the Blackhawk is the strongest affordable (that leaves out Freedom Arms) single actions going IMHO. The adjustable sight, to me, for a working gun, is necessary, especially one that will see light loads as well as heavy.
 
i have an old model 357mag, made in 1960, still running strong. will shoot max loads all day long.

murf
 
A Blackhawk in .357mag is the best revolver money you'll ever spend, bar none.

p.s., though for the life of me, I can't imagine why I would ever have a need to convert a .357 to 9x19
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top