Ruger Magazine parts list

[creitzel]

A while back, I was reading a post where someone linked to another site that lists all of the parts needed to construct a magazine for a ruger Mark II, along with their ruger part numbers. The individual parts can be purchased much cheaper than buying the assembled magazine, and I'd like to order a couple of these now. Of course, now that I need it, I can't find the dang thread anymore lol. So, does anyone have this link handy?

Thanks in advance,

Chris

 

[Rob62]

Howdy Chris,

You asked and you shall receive. The prices may have gone up. This list is at least a year plus old.

Ruger MK II .22RF Pistol Magazine from Parts info

Magazine Block Bottom
MKI A-17 $.50
MKII A01702 $.50
22/45 AP01700 $.75
MKIII ? ?

Magazine Block Bottom Retaining Plunger
MKI A02800 $.50
MKII A02800 $.50
22/45 A02800 $.50
MKIII ? ?

Magazine Follower
MKI A-29 $.75
MKII A02900 $.75
22/45 A02900 $.75
MKIII ? ?

Magazine Follower Button
MKI A02512 $.50
MKII A02512 $.50
22/45 A02512 $.50
MKIII ? ?

Magazine Shell
MKI A-40 $6.25
MKII A04000 $6.25
22/45 AP04000 $6.25
MKII ? ?

Magazine Spring
MKI A03300 $.50
MKII A03301 $.50
22/45 A03301 $.50
MKIII ? ?

Total for Parts MKI/II $9.00 22/45 $9.25

Complete Assembly
MKI AMC $16.10
MKII M-10 $16.90
22/45 AP-10 $16.90
MKIII M10MKIII ?
22/45MKIII AP10MKIII ?

Source of info: http://www.ruger.com/Firearms/SE-PartsBookletsP.html
http://www.ruger.com/Firearms/SE-InstructManualsP.html
7/16/2004

Shipping & Handling $3.50 for up to ? sets of parts (6 confirmed)

To Order:
Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.
200 Ruger Road
Prescott, AZ 86301
Telephone: 928-778-6555, Fax: 928-778-6633


Regards,

Rob

 

[creitzel]

Rob,

Thanks a bunch! That was exactly what I was referring to

Chris

 

[model 649]

Just got off the phone with Ruger's Prescott facility and it appears the "parts loophole" has been slammed shut. The mag shell alone is over $10.00. The nice woman said to me "You are aware that the parts are no cheaper than buying the whole magazine?" I asked her about the prices on the site and she said those were very old, indeed. I looked again and there is a revision date of '01 on the list. So much for that good idea. It would be nice if they updated their site more frequently (just a suggestion).
Josh