S&w 686

Status
Not open for further replies.

257WM_CDL-SF

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2009
Messages
379
i have decided if do well on my taxes to buy a S&W 686. just love how they feel and look.MY question is a 6 shot or 7 shot? Does any have a advantage over the other
 
all kidding aside, both outstanding

buy one earlier than 1998 if you want to avoid MIM parts and the idiotic lock.

I picked up a police trade in for 400 bucks. Average price...I have seen them cheaper.
 
Does any have a advantage over the other

If it's purely for SD, the 7-shot has an obvious advantage.

IMO, though, a 4" 6-shot is as versatile a 686 as you can get, since it would allow you to shoot IDPA, ICORE, and/or USPSA matches if you ever get the itch. More speedloaders options, too.
 
I recently just picked up two 686-4 7 shots. One is a 2.5" and the other is a 4". I personally would get a 7 shot over a 6 if I had the choice. Nothing wrong with the 6 shot but why not have the extra round.

Also I would look around for a nice used one without the lock. I know lock failures are few and far between but I personally just don't like how they look. Here are my two 686's.

DSC_0001.jpg

DSC_0008.jpg


Later,

Person
 
I just bought the 686P 6" from cabellas last week. Shot my friends and loved it.
 
The 7 shot is actually stronger since the locking notches are offset from the chambers. The 6 shot is easier to use if you plan on doing IDPA competition with it though.

Unless you're looking for a purely "gaming" gun or just cannot stand the idea of MIM & lock hole, the 7 shot has no real disadvantage and plenty of real advantages.
 
I bought my 686 6" from a kid I worked with, $200, original box and paperwork, two speed loaders, and two boxes of factory .357 ammo. His mother didn't want a gun in the house! And it's a very nice gun.
 
From what I've seen comparing rhe 7 shot cylinder with the 6 shot cylinder is that the wall thickness of the 6 shot is noticably thicker than the wall thickness of the 7 shot. I would assume that the 6 shot must be stronger unless the 7 shot cylinder uses a different stronger steel. Is my logic faulty? Am I way off base here?
 
From what I've seen comparing rhe 7 shot cylinder with the 6 shot cylinder is that the wall thickness of the 6 shot is noticably thicker than the wall thickness of the 7 shot. I would assume that the 6 shot must be stronger unless the 7 shot cylinder uses a different stronger steel. Is my logic faulty? Am I way off base here?

As pointed out above, the 7 shooter is actually stronger because the cylinder stop notches on the 6 shooter are directly above the chamber - making that the weak point. 5 and 7 shot S&Ws do not have this weak spot because the notch is over the thickest part of the cylinder.

As a side note, Ruger offsets their notches, so that the notch is never directly over the thin wall of the chamber.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top