Safety lapse kills officer

Status
Not open for further replies.

Preacherman

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
13,306
Location
Louisiana, USA
From the Santa Maria Times (http://www.santamariatimes.com/articles/2003/11/16/sections/corbett/corbett.txt):

Many can learn from one fatal mistake

Steve Corbett
Wednesday, November 19, 2003

Robert Ramos made a fatal mistake.

As good a cop as he was, the 52-year-old veteran officer died last month when his gun accidentally discharged as Ramos was dressing for work.

Santa Maria Police Chief Dan Macagni doesn't want another good cop to die.

The tragic error that took Ramos' life must never happen again.

"Bob had many years on the SWAT team. On the tactical team. Had 23 years as a police officer. But when he was holstering his weapon, Bob made the mistake of having his finger on the trigger. He did this on a regular basis," Macagni said last week. "Even when we train, we tell (officers) don't do that.

"He made a mistake, he did, and went to holster his weapon and slightly missed the holster opening, hit it on top of his belt line and pulled the trigger.

"It was a mistake, a very serious mistake, and one that we all have to live with and learn from," Macagni said. "We do have to learn from this and we have to train because of this not to make these mistakes. We as police officers can never become complacent."

Keeping a finger on the trigger had long been general practice, Macagni said.

"Our tactical team has been in existence since 1986," Macagni said. "Early on in our tactical training, we were trained to keep it in the trigger guard ... the finger, in the trigger guard in a ready position ... on the trigger."

As new methods of training evolved, that practice changed, Macagni said.

The new method of training involves keeping the finger outside the trigger and along the frame guard, Macagni said. That is done for safety purposes, he said, in case the officer stumbles, falls or bumps into an object.

With the finger off the trigger, an accidental discharge is prevented, Macagni said.

"Our SWAT team specifically trains now - and Bob's been off the SWAT team for several years - specifically trains always, including our machine guns, to keep your finger outside the trigger guard," Macagni said.

Although Ramos was alone when the accident happened, Macagni said that experts who tested the officer's gun found that it could not have malfunctioned. Details of the autopsy report that's completed, but not yet in Macagni's possession, support the theory of how Ramos died as well.

Macagni also said he feels confident about the conclusion because of "personal knowledge of knowing that that's how (Ramos) carried his weapon, how he handled his weapon and in tactical situations how he operated."

During a previous interview a few days earlier, Macagni stood quietly by his desk at police headquarters to demonstrate what he believes happened in the early morning hours of Oct. 9.

Removing the semi-automatic handgun from his holster, Macagni released the clip and laid it on the table. Macagni then carefully ejected the live round from the chamber. Double-checking to make sure the weapon was empty, Macagni showed how Ramos had routinely shoved his gun into the holster.

Ramos wore an "open-ended Border Patrol" holster high on his hip, Macagni said.

The angle of the holster, the force Ramos used to holster the gun securely and his finger on the trigger created an accident waiting to happen.

"He always holstered hard and fast," Macagni said. "He was a Marine and he was very deliberate in his movement. He always did it the same way. I saw him do it a hundred times.

"It should never have happened," Macagni said. "It did. And we're all having to live with that."

Ramos also had not engaged the safety mechanism on his 9 mm semi-automatic Baretta 92 FS, according to Macagni.

"On that particular gun, you could drop it down (and) even if you did pull the trigger it would not activate the hammer mechanism. But if you leave it up in the ready position and pull the trigger, it's going to go off. And that's the way he always carried his weapon."

Macagni said that most police officers, including himself, do not utilize the safety for tactical reasons.

"When you draw, the weapon's ready to fire," Macagni said.

"If you want to be super safe, you don't carry a round in the chamber," he said.

Ramos carried a round in the chamber - standard for police.

"Nobody that I know of in law enforcement or in my department would carry an empty chamber. That would make no sense and could get you killed," Macagni said.

Ramos got killed anyway.

An old-school habit helped create a dangerous routine.

The training improvement seems so simple.

"It does," Macagni said. "And that's why it's so tragic ... I think about it every day. I think about it every time I holster my weapon, every time I draw my weapon, every time I train with my weapon. And I know the men and women that are doing the same thing are thinking the same thing: We lost one of our good friends because of a tragic mistake."
 
"Bob had many years on the SWAT team. On the tactical team. Had 23 years as a police officer. But when he was holstering his weapon, Bob made the mistake of having his finger on the trigger. He did this on a regular basis,"

..uh...
 
Errrr, I am confused.:uhoh:

If he always holstered his weapon with his finger on the trigger, it seems likely that he would have had a ND long before now.

It sucks that this happened. It sucks more that that department was so screwed up in their training. Even if he was off the SWAT team for a while, you'd figure that MAYBE the might be SOME trickle down of the 'new' technique of keeping your finger off the trigger during their qualification cycle.
 
I'm Skeptical.....

I think the chief is trying to spare someone's feelings. There is a lot in this article that just doesn't sound right. Let's think about this for a minute.

Ramos wore an "open-ended Border Patrol" holster high on his hip, Macagni said.

Ok, we have a holster on the belt on the strong side, with the end slightly canted to the rear.

"He made a mistake, he did, and went to holster his weapon and slightly missed the holster opening, hit it on top of his belt line and pulled the trigger.

It seems to me that if he hit his belt with his finger on the trigger, the weapon should have been pointed somewhat away from his body. The negligent discharge should have hit him in a relatively non-vital spot.

"Our tactical team has been in existence since 1986," Macagni said. "Early on in our tactical training, we were trained to keep it in the trigger guard ... the finger, in the trigger guard in a ready position ... on the trigger."

I graduated from the combined Illinois State Police/USAF Security Police TRT/EST School in May of 1986. Keeping your finger on the trigger certainly wasn't taught there. In fact I can't think of anyplace it was taught in 1986. But then I could be wrong.

I don't know anything more about this then what's in this article, but my gut feeling is that this isn't the whole story. I'm going to stick my neck out and say that the chief may be trying to spare someone's feelings about what really happened. It just doesn't add up. Can you even buy a Border Patrol type holster for a 92F that doesn't have a covered tigger? I haven't seen a duty type holster that didn't cover the trigger (making it impossible to holster with your finger on the trigger) in years.

Officer Ramos' family and coworkers have my deepest sympathy and I will add him to my prayers. But this description of the accident doesn't sound or feel right.

Jeff
 
It seems to me that if he hit his belt with his finger on the trigger, the weapon should have been pointed somewhat away from his body. The negligent discharge should have hit him in a relatively non-vital spot.

The only thing I can think of that could have killed him quickly is if he hit his femoral artery and bled out before EMTs could get to him. Still, I don't think we're getting the whole story...

-Teuf
 
Quote-----
I don't know anything more about this then what's in this article, but my gut feeling is that this isn't the whole story. It just doesn't add up. Can you even buy a Border Patrol type holster for a 92F that doesn't have a covered tigger?

It seems to me that if he hit his belt with his finger on the trigger, the weapon should have been pointed somewhat away from his body. The negligent discharge should have hit him in a relatively non-vital spot.
-------

These are the first couple of things that I thought of when I read the orginal post. Also, seems like a seasoned cop would have the presence of mind to apply direct pressure to even an arterial hit in the leg and call 911.

I feel for the family and I am sorry to hear about the death of another apparently dedicated public servant.
 
So, his safety failed? Doesn't the 92F have a safety?

It seems two mistakes were required for this to happen....
 
Don Galt,

the safety didn't fail. The chief said he didn't use it. That is entirely possible. There have always been two schools of thought on the slide mounted safety/decockers on Beretta, Ruger and S&W autos. Many advocate using it as a decocker only and carrying the weapon in DA mode with the safety off. Others advocate using the safety as an extra check in case of a weapon snatch. I carried a 92F on duty for a few years (until the city issued autos, S&W 5906s then Glock 21 currently), I carried the safety off and used a Safariland level three holster. I never could train myself to smoothly wipe the slide mounted safety off while drawing. The chief was right that many officers choose not to use the safety as anything but a decocker. IMHO that was one of the few true things he said in that article.

Jeff
 
Don, the M9 has a "dingus dropper", not a "safety". The safety is, of course, between the ears.

Jeff, IMHO that was the ONLY thing the Chief was not fabricating. My 5 year old nephew could come up with a better cover story than that rubbish--I hear better over the phone through the wire-reinforced polyglass. :D
 
El Tejon,

If the story was fabricated, can you speculate as to the truth? I have no experience with these things, but I'm interested.

I have heard several similar accounts of LEOs shooting themselves while holstering their weapons, all of them because they did so with their fingers on the trigger. I also recently saw video of a police bust where an officer almost shot her partner, who was handcuffing the suspect, because she still had her finger on the trigger of her SA, cocked-and-not-locked semi-auto.

This is bizarre to me. I am still new to CCW, have maybe 2 years experience handling a handgun, but I know better than this myself. When I was first exposed to guns - at age 9 or so - my dad ****burned**** into my brain the rules of gun safety:

1) Treat every gun as if it were loaded.
2) Never point the gun at something you do not intend to shoot.
3) Never put your finger on the trigger until the moment you are ready to shoot.

My dad never let me touch a gun until he beleived that I practiced these principles unerringly.

When I first picked up a handgun again, years after I learned those rules (I'm 39 now), following them was still automatic. I have to believe those rules are not "new" (they're at least 30 years old, anyway). Why would not LEOs have been given the same basics? I would have thought they would be held to a higher standard. Maybe it's just because my dad loved me, and this is not a factor in police bureaucracues?

Recently I amused myself by noticing how I pick up a drill or a power saw - index finger extended along and outside the "trigger guard" until ready to "fire". :) Certainly not a bad habit there, either!
 
"He always holstered hard and fast," Macagni said. "He was a Marine and he was very deliberate in his movement. He always did it the same way. I saw him do it a hundred times.

Never been in the service, but I have seen WWII era photos of soldiers, not Marines, holding their 1911 with the trigger finger very plainly outside the trigger guard. WWII was before 1986 IIRC.

Sorry for the guy tho. Sounds like a good cop, good citizen.
 
uniforms-911_1718_3172348

99ABorderPatrol.jpg

One type of "Border Patrol" holster. Most have the trigger area exposed, some don't. One mistake that can happen with msny kinds of thumb break holsters is on reholstering, the thumbreak strap can push against the trigger. One holster in particular was advertized as needing care in this area (haven't found again yet). This may be what happened. We won't really know until the reports are released and the location of the bullet wound is known. Doesn't sound like they consider anything suspicious according to the report.
 
We won't really know until the reports are released and the location of the bullet wound is known

So very true. But what about the training to have the finger in the trigger guard. I have seen pics on histiry channel and in publication where this was NOT done in WWII. Now that I think about it Vietnam clips IIRC.
 
First, a tragedy..

Second, from my personal experience, I had a soft leather holster for my steyr before, and it had a thumb break.. it was very difficult to reholster quickly without looking down, and if I kept my finger off the trigger when I reholstered (which is what I do) there was ONE time the thumb break got in the trigger well. scared the Be-Jesus out of me.. and I was a bit shaken up by that experience..

SO...

KYDEX :D

I have a "two click" reholstering technique that I like..

Kydex is hard, and doesn't deform, a very good thing. I can reholster without looking down and keep my eyes where they need to be, on a BG if he is in front of me.

I slap my gun in a slight arm, to get the nose of the gun in the kydex holster... I should hear a "click" that is slightly hollow from the slap, that tells me the nose of the gun is at the hole of the holster.

I push the gun in until two things happen:

#1) my finger which is on the side of rail, feels the kydex.
#2) I hear the second "click" of my gun being locked into place into the Kydex.

SLAP! Click. Finger is touching the side of my Kydex. Because the Steyr has a wonderful loaded chamber indicator, I swipe my thumb over the butt of the gun, to confirm that it won't fall out, and to mentally confirm to myself I've got one that's hot in the chamber.

I did this about a million times until it was very natural and I could do it without thinking and without danger.

TRAINING makes all the difference..

As for the fairy tale of a story the chief is telling.. We aren't getting the entire story..
 
there was ONE time the thumb break got in the trigger well. scared the Be-Jesus out of me.. and I was a bit shaken up by that experience..
Ditto, same experiance here, same "Scared the sh*t out of me"!!! I got rid of that holster. (I has used it for 3 years, and it only happened once, but I was able to recreate it with little difficulty).
 
No, I read the story to indicate that he holstered the Beretta 92 with the hammer down, safety off, but did so in a habitually "hard" manner which I believe is part of the negligence behind the discharge. He either did not have the pistol in the holster and hit the belt with his trigger finger ON THE TRIGGER, or was in the holster and hit the belt from that position.

Seems like any time your finger is on the trigger, you should not ram the firearm forward when in close proximity to anything... unless it's the BG's COM.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top