Let's say my carry load is .357 Mag 125 grains.
I want to practice with mild loads that cost less and put less wear on the gun and brass. At the same time I might want a practice load to reasonably reproduce some ballistic aspects of the carry load - specifically the point of impact (at close range) and felt recoil.
If I replace the 125 grain bullet with, say, 158 grain bullet (126% weight), I can drop the muzzle velocity to 79% for similar recoil/muzzle flip, etc.
Such a drop in muzzle velocity would mean 63% of original energy.
That means at least 37% less powder.
With bullets of 180 grain (144% weight), velocity can be reduced to 69% and energy to 48% - 52% less.
Sure, heavy bullets cost more but so does powder. What say you?
miko
I want to practice with mild loads that cost less and put less wear on the gun and brass. At the same time I might want a practice load to reasonably reproduce some ballistic aspects of the carry load - specifically the point of impact (at close range) and felt recoil.
If I replace the 125 grain bullet with, say, 158 grain bullet (126% weight), I can drop the muzzle velocity to 79% for similar recoil/muzzle flip, etc.
Such a drop in muzzle velocity would mean 63% of original energy.
That means at least 37% less powder.
With bullets of 180 grain (144% weight), velocity can be reduced to 69% and energy to 48% - 52% less.
Sure, heavy bullets cost more but so does powder. What say you?
miko