howdy.
In theory, this sounds like a great idea. But then, when looking at the mental state of the abused, I doubt there will be much response. Take a look at this blog site & read under 'why the victim stays' & 'betrayal trauma'. There are a lot reasons why victims stay - fear, shame, hope, dependence, children, love, family pressure, religion, & isolation are some reasons given. Ever hear of Stockholm Syndrome?
http://abusesanctuary.blogspot.com/
The firearm was a remarkable tool in enpowering myself, and getting me out of the 'victim mode'. However, while still involved a mentally & emotionally abusive relationship, using a gun was the last thing I would have thought of - and if anyone had mentioned it, I'd have refused. It was'nt until afterwards I realized I needed more defences than what I had.
I'd suggest a fireams training course as a method of therapy any day. But issuing emergency permits may not be the answer to protecting all abused people; you have to see that not all victims are in a stable emotional state. They have to indicate they want that level of defence for themselves. Also, I think they need to be mentally competent enough to handle the reality that they may kill the abuser if a gun is used; that the abuser may kill them; that the abuser will not change. It is the abused whom has to change.
For those that are fairly stable & wish to carry, by all means, Yes! Do! Issue them a permit at the point of filing a complaint; just insure proper use with a short (1 day or less) training class &/or show competency with a standard marksmanship test.
At this date, Missouri does not have a provision for emergency permit issue. Try this site for details on state laws concerning carrying firams & CCW.
http://www.packing.org/state/missouri/
Interesting thread. May I ask what brought it to your mind?