wacki
Member
Future weapons featured this rifle:
http://www.defensereview.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=885
The shows IAR was basically a 5.56 m4 with a slightly heavier barrel and a selector switch that switched the rifle from closed bolt firing (semi) to open bolt firing (full auto). He unloaded 2 clips in in the M4 and then the IAR. He poured water on the m4's barrel and made a big deal about the steam. He then closed the bolt of the IAR and touched the bolt with his finger bragging about how cool it was to the touch. Not exactly the same test and a little deceptive but whatever. How much of a difference does open bolt firing make? I'm guessing the theory is that it allows more airflow through the barrel allowing for greater cooling. But does anyone have any solid numbers displaying the differences? For instance a rifle in closed bolt can fire 700 rounds in 2 minutes while an open bolt can fire 1000 rounds before over heating.
Just interesting in know what the real differences are.
http://www.defensereview.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=885
The shows IAR was basically a 5.56 m4 with a slightly heavier barrel and a selector switch that switched the rifle from closed bolt firing (semi) to open bolt firing (full auto). He unloaded 2 clips in in the M4 and then the IAR. He poured water on the m4's barrel and made a big deal about the steam. He then closed the bolt of the IAR and touched the bolt with his finger bragging about how cool it was to the touch. Not exactly the same test and a little deceptive but whatever. How much of a difference does open bolt firing make? I'm guessing the theory is that it allows more airflow through the barrel allowing for greater cooling. But does anyone have any solid numbers displaying the differences? For instance a rifle in closed bolt can fire 700 rounds in 2 minutes while an open bolt can fire 1000 rounds before over heating.
Just interesting in know what the real differences are.