I strongly prefer .45 ACP for autoloaders, and I own several (Sig P-220, H&K USP, Glock 36, and Colt, Kimber and two Springfield 1911A1s). Eventually, I plan to buy another .45 ACP semiautomatic; I have narrowed my choices to: (1) the new Smith 1911A1, (2) the Wilson KZ-45, and (3) the CZ 97B.
I believe the Smith will be a first-quality 1911A1, comparable to similarly priced (~$650) Springfields and Kimbers.
The Wilson “tactical†KZ-45 is somewhat more expensive (~$1050), but it loads 10+1 and has Wilson’s excellent quality, accuracy, reliability, durability, and customer service.
This leaves the CZ 97-B. I am very impressed with my CZ 75-B; its quality, accuracy, reliability, durability, and overall VALUE have been superior. Further, everything I read regarding the 97B suggests it is simply a terrific .45 ACP: (1) 10+1, (2) Browning (BHP) design approach, (3) great quality, (4) outstanding reliability and durability, (5) superb fundamental strength, (6) excellent accuracy, and (7) COST UNDER $500. However, it is a big sidearm and my greatest concern with the 97B is CAN IT REALISTICALLY BE CONCEALED (note: I have no problems concealing full-size 1911A1s)?
Therefore, two questions for our members:
a) Smith 1911A1, Wilson KZ-45, or CZ 97B . . . and why?
b) Practically, can the CZ 97B be concealed easily (similar to a full-size 1911A1)?
Thanks and Happy Thanksgiving to all.
I believe the Smith will be a first-quality 1911A1, comparable to similarly priced (~$650) Springfields and Kimbers.
The Wilson “tactical†KZ-45 is somewhat more expensive (~$1050), but it loads 10+1 and has Wilson’s excellent quality, accuracy, reliability, durability, and customer service.
This leaves the CZ 97-B. I am very impressed with my CZ 75-B; its quality, accuracy, reliability, durability, and overall VALUE have been superior. Further, everything I read regarding the 97B suggests it is simply a terrific .45 ACP: (1) 10+1, (2) Browning (BHP) design approach, (3) great quality, (4) outstanding reliability and durability, (5) superb fundamental strength, (6) excellent accuracy, and (7) COST UNDER $500. However, it is a big sidearm and my greatest concern with the 97B is CAN IT REALISTICALLY BE CONCEALED (note: I have no problems concealing full-size 1911A1s)?
Therefore, two questions for our members:
a) Smith 1911A1, Wilson KZ-45, or CZ 97B . . . and why?
b) Practically, can the CZ 97B be concealed easily (similar to a full-size 1911A1)?
Thanks and Happy Thanksgiving to all.