I just had 9+ hours of class yesterday, don't have too much of a voice left.. Good thing I'm typing.
Contrary to popular belief, the "Elitist" mentality runs far and deep in the military.
One of my students (and might I add, the most attentive student I've ever had in my life) is also the head drill sergent of Taiwan).. He talked about how he felt the lack of rigorious training of the part of civilians would sway his opinion that civilians should own guns.
The generals however, seemed straight out, "Guns are for the military, _ONLY_"
But they were highly curious about the "gun culture" in America.
The Drill Sergent said because there are so many soldiers and so little budget, they only shoot 3x a month, and 1 case each time.
He said he was an ok shooter, (but from what the others all say, about 3" groups from iron sights @ 300m on his bad days doesn't sound just "ok" to me! If that's what I did on my bad days, I'd be posting pics everyday!) But because of the budget problems, they are actually EXCELLENT shooters, dry firing practice being a daily routine.
They couldn't get it into their heads, that a civilian could own a gun and be ok... They also didn't believe that a civilian could obtain adequate shooting skills without daily training.
Even on base, none of the officers are armed. Only MP's are armed on the base. I couldn't believe it!
They were however... VERY PRO bayonets.. They felt that everybody should have a bayonet. go figure..
And as far as the gun debates go.. Is there a gun debate that I lose??
They asked about marksmenship. That was their primary concern as far as civilians owning guns.