The American workhorse .40 S&W

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have nothing against the .40 however after a while you get over loaded with
different powder and bullets and dies and you have to tone down a little. So
I stick with the .327 mag, .380, 38, 357, 9mm, 45 Auto, 44 Special and .44 magnum.
Also, a bunch of rifle calibers. enough for me at this point.
Zeke
 
I'm not a fan of 180 gr ammo, my P229 is loaded with 155 gr. XTP right now. I want some 155 Speer gold dots for it too.
Underwood has some very serious loads in 155 with both XTP and Gold Dot bullets that I want to range test a few boxes of before I start carrying them, both rounds are advertised @ 1300 fps and 583 ft-lb of KE, my Hornady Custums are rated at 1180fps and the winchesters I carry are rated at 1210fps
 
my two favorite .40s and yes I like 165 Winchester Ranger Bonded for serious carry.
P1030532_zpsoxtlu8op.jpg
[/URL]
 
I go by how much brass I can find at my private range (500 members). It's mostly 9 mm. That stuff just piles up in the buckets. After that 45 ACP but not a lot of that. Hardly any 40 to be found. Of course if you go to a police range it's going to be mostly 40 but that will probably change soon. Probably already changed at some ranges.

Going by that I would say it's on it's way out. Not dead, just not real popular.
 
Last edited:
I found that while I am less adept at handguns, for now, than rifles and shotguns, I shoot quite often. The mark with the latter. In fact, when given the opportunity to shoot on a local sheriff department range I was better than the deputies on speed and accuracy.

I was not, however, as good as they were with Glock 22/23 pistols. I am much better with a SIG SP2022 and P226 TACOPS both in 9mm. I do shooting a full size frame P250 in .40 S&Worth decently and roughly on parking with Glock .40 S&W.
 
I consider .40S&W to be a very polarizing caliber. Most people tolerate it or hate it and generally few people love it. My primary carry is .40 but that doesn't mean I won't want 9mm and 45s in my safe for a carry rotation.
 
DeadEye9,

Excellent points.

Not anti 40 there just is simply not enough even differences between the 9mm and 40 to get excited about.

When looking at Law Enforcement Agencies such as Police Departments that use the 40 it is easy to form the opinion about how well they are satisfied they are with it.

I have posted this before but I will again. A large nearby metro police department (400 +/- personnel) issue Glocks in 40 cal. The range master, instructors and training department all want for the department to switch to the 9mm. The 9mm results is less wear and tear on the guns meaning more long term savings since the guns will not have to be repaired and replaced as often, easier to train and qualify new officers and significant cost savings in 9mm ammunition over the 40.

The 40 high water mark crested years ago. The metro police department I am talking about is sticking with the 40 cal. because

1) police top brass are not “gun guys & gals”

and

2) they are buying and equipping the officers with body cameras so there is not enough money in the budget to make the switch.

Bullet design has made a lot of advances since the 40 was originally introduced.

In addition my primary edc is a SIG P239 9mm. For me this is a excellent blend of size, weight of the gun, recoil and stopping power.

The numbers the O.P. posted look nice on paper but are largely meaningless in the real world stopping power.
 
DeadEye9,

Excellent points.

Not anti 40 there just is simply not enough even differences between the 9mm and 40 to get excited about.

When looking at Law Enforcement Agencies such as Police Departments that use the 40 it is easy to form the opinion about how well they are satisfied they are with it.

I have posted this before but I will again. A large nearby metro police department (400 +/- personnel) issue Glocks in 40 cal. The range master, instructors and training department all want for the department to switch to the 9mm. The 9mm results is less wear and tear on the guns meaning more long term savings since the guns will not have to be repaired and replaced as often, easier to train and qualify new officers and significant cost savings in 9mm ammunition over the 40.

The 40 high water mark crested years ago. The metro police department I am talking about is sticking with the 40 cal. because

1) police top brass are not “gun guys & gals”

and

2) they are buying and equipping the officers with body cameras so there is not enough money in the budget to make the switch.

Bullet design has made a lot of advances since the 40 was originally introduced.

In addition my primary edc is a SIG P239 9mm. For me this is a excellent blend of size, weight of the gun, recoil and stopping power.

The numbers the O.P. posted look nice on paper but are largely meaningless in the real world stopping power.
This is exactly true and why I don't get caught up in velocity, energy etc numbers. That stuff is all voodoo on the street and what actually matters is where you put the bullet and what it actually does when you put it there. You can have a 1500fps .40 or .45 auto load that expands to nearly an inch but if it only penetrates 6-7" and doesn't hit anything but null soft tissues the odds of that load being a good manstopper are very slim. I think these days people get too hung up on the numbers instead of worrying about what a given load is actually doing in real world shootings. This is the age of technology after all so the days of needing to work inside the hospital or courthouse just to get the information held within are over. I'm guilt of being a velocity nerd at times with my handloads, trying to push the envelope and get faster and faster loads, but that is for punching paper and steel, not defending my life. What many fail to realize is that in human tissue a lot of times the faster a round is & the more a round expands the LESS it penetrates. Yes we do want defensive handgun ammo to expand as that is how JhPs are designed to perform, however we do not want so much velocity/expansion so as to disrupt the key stopping factor of handgun rounds, penetration. Also with a lot of bullets, even bonded ones, manufactures spec velocity at certain thresholds. When
Boutique loaders like Underwood and Doubletap, etc crank the velocity above that point many times they actually cripple their overall performance. Too much velocity can cause a bullet to come apart/fragment, penetrate to shallow to hit vitals and also break apart on barriers. Even Gold Dots have their limits and Underwoods cranked up GDHP typically Penetrate a few inches less than any Speer factory product and turn a nearly barrier blind load into a marginal barrier defeater at best. Same exact bullet and caliber just different speeds and it gives you two totally different end results when they hit things. In the end, it behooves anyone interested in protecting their own lives with a daily carried handgun to do a little research and see what actually works well on the street and not what X Y Z reccomends or what load is the fastest. The best loads are ones that will pass FBI testing for barriers like heavy clothing, penetrate sufficiently and expand regularly but also go bang every time in YOUR handgun(s). Also familiarization with your carry load will be worth more than any velocity spec sheet ever will. Running a couple mags worth of your carry ammo then calling it good is simply not enough. I suggest to interested parties that after their research they choose a FEW loads they feel suit their protection needs and then go run a couple HUNDRED rounds of each through your carry guns to check function, feel and point of impact. This is a multipurpose process and allows you to 1) know your weapon and your chosen loads will function when you need them, 2) know exactly where that load hits when you aim in your usual style and 3) choosing a few loads initially saves you from having to choose an untested load should your primary choice not be available at one time or another. Too many people buy a 20rd box of some random JHP, load their mags and forget it. Maybe shoot a couple rounds at the range but by and large practice with carry ammo is rare, and it shouldn't be. The time to learn how a carry load will perform in your handgun is not when you need to depend on that combination to save your life. When it comes to personal defense, Stack as many cards in your favor as you can by choosing reliable loads in a realistic caliber that YOU are comfortable with, through a reliable handgun platform that again YOU are comfortable with and feed that handgun with loads YOU have proven to function well in practice.
For me, my everyday carry in moderate climates is 9mm. In the coldest winter months I switch to .357 Sig, solely because it has some superior barrier penetrating loads that lend themselves well to shooting through layers of heavy clothing. My platform for both is the exact same pistol, so training is simplified.
(Glock 19/32)
As far as carry loads, my chosen are:
9mm
124 HST (Full Size pistol)
124 +P HST (for Shield 9/P11 backup pistols-gives same velocity as standard load from full size barrel so performance is the same from both guns)
124 Gold Dot +P (both pistol sizes)
147 +P HST (both sizes)
124 +P PDX1 (both sizes)
Critical Duty 135 standard pressure
For .357 Sig-
125 Federal HST
135 Critical Duty
125 Gold Dot
125 CorBon DPX
These are only a portion of the excellent loads available but these are all rounds I've chosen based on what I know they will do in the field and how I know they will shoot for me and my guns.
 
The first semiauto gun I ever bought was a relatively light 40 cal. I was an inexperienced shooter. It was the wrong choice. Too light, and snappy for me to ever warm up to it. I shot it accurately, but follow up shots were terribly slow.

I sold it to my dad, and since I'm the only firearm enthusiast in the family, I have no doubt I'll inherit it. So I may get back into 40 cal at some point, or I may trade it towards a gun I want more. That way it's still a keep sake from him.

I'm a much more experienced shooter now, and suspect I could do a lot better with it. I shoot small 357's and a 45 caliber XDs. So I think muzzle flip is a lot less of a concern for me now.

The low priced HK P30s in 40 cal have been very tempting.
 
In my experience .40 is a pretty good caliber. I was never attracted to the round, but five years ago the corrections agency for which I work switched from .38 Special Smith and Wesson 64 revolvers to the Glock 22. Folks like myself with decades of firearms experience (and the guys on the SERT Team) did well with it. However, corrections personnel with little or no firearms experience still struggle to qualify with it every year. I won't go so far as to state that the .40 is an "experts gun," but if the extent of your firearms experience was the academy and 50 rounds a year, then it might be a problem. I only bought my first .40 last year, an all metal Stoeger Cougar just for fun. I like it, but I suppose I will never shoot as well with it as my beloved Browning Hi-Power, which I have been blasting away with for nearly 30 years.
 
In my experience .40 is a pretty good caliber. I was never attracted to the round, but five years ago the corrections agency for which I work switched from .38 Special Smith and Wesson 64 revolvers to the Glock 22. Folks like myself with decades of firearms experience (and the guys on the SERT Team) did well with it. However, corrections personnel with little or no firearms experience still struggle to qualify with it every year. I won't go so far as to state that the .40 is an "experts gun," but if the extent of your firearms experience was the academy and 50 rounds a year, then it might be a problem. I only bought my first .40 last year, an all metal Stoeger Cougar just for fun. I like it, but I suppose I will never shoot as well with it as my beloved Browning Hi-Power, which I have been blasting away with for nearly 30 years.
I think you have a good point. I bought my first .40 S&W pistol back in the 90s (a Beretta Cougar 8040F by the way) despite having no experience with the round. Back then, it seemed to be the self-defense caliber to have. I had shot a good bit of 9mm and .45 ACP as well as 38 Special and 357 Magnum, and I did not anticipate having any trouble with .40 S&W.

The first time I shot that Beretta was a wake up. I wasn't used to the recoil characteristics and I was pretty inaccurate with it. I liked the Beretta a lot, however, so I stuck with the caliber and eventually came to like it and shoot it pretty well. Now I really don't appreciate all that much difference between calibers when shooting 9mm, .40 S&W, or .45 ACP, although my forty caliber pistols are all-metal and at least mid-sized.

I think .40 S&W might not be the best choice for those who shoot infrequently or shoot a compact or subcompact, light weight pistol. I suspect many who dislike the round have a relatively passing experience with shooting it.
 
What I like about the .40S&W is it's a couple of bucks cheaper than a box of .45acp at WW, I carry a gen 2 G23 and don't get the complaints about recoil. I'm comfortable with just .380acp, .40S&W for CC and .45acp, .45C for woods carry.
 
I think .40 S&W might not be the best choice for those who shoot infrequently or shoot a compact or subcompact, light weight pistol. I suspect many who dislike the round have a relatively passing experience with shooting it.
I agree. I would only add that it isn't necessarily the best cartridge to start shooting semiautos with either. It seems a 9mm or 45 with a bit less muzzle flip, in an equivalent sized gun, would be a better choice. If I hadn't started there, I suspect I would have no issues with the cartridge.
 
My first .40 was a Glock 27. Was never a Glock fan but my local gun broker said I really need to take a look at this. Since to me it was a new caliber and since I never was a fan of the 9 mm, and since it was a Glock,I handled it and liked the gun so I bought it.
When I took this to the range for the first time this thing really impressed the crap out of me. I never shot so well with something right out of the box. The .40 round impressed me as well.
Later in time I purchased a Beretta 8040 shot that one well and used it for a CCW for awhile, now it's just my 27. I like the .40 cal. as well"....
But the 27 made Glock fan ! :thumbup:
 
If your .40 is "snappy and hard to control, it is because you are making it that way. The .40 was originally loaded as a 180gr bullet doing around 950fps. That is the round the FBI found to be very effective in many different situations. Later when the "faster is always better" crowd realized they could add a few hundred feet per second to it, they created the "snappy" .40 that everyone whines about. The original round is still very effective (more so with modern bullets) and still very pleasant to shoot. So are the 165gr loads when loaded to around 980fps.



Check out how well the lower velocity .40 loads did in this extensive ballistics gel test compared to even the +P 45ACP loads:

http://www.luckygunner.com/labs/self-defense-ammo-ballistic-tests/#380ACP
 
What's lost in these arguments is that the gun has a considerable impact on the felt recoil. My first 40 was a XD 40 subcompact. To me, it had that overly snappy recoil so many people talk about. I wound up selling it. I tried the XDM 3.8 compact in 40, and it does a great job taming the recoil. The same can be said for my XDM 4.5, Glock 27 and Glock 23, all in 40. In regards to whether it's "dead or dying" or not, the marketplace will determine that.

I think you're on to something here. I took a quick glance at my copy of "Cartridges of the World" (11th Edition) and compared the "energy" as stated for not only those two cartridges but also .357 Sig and 10mm Auto and saw they are fairly close. Nobody really complains about how "snappy" .357 snubbies are.
 
I'm at best a decent shot since my eyesight has went south but as far as effective placement I can more than hold my own with P229.
25 yards in motion between 3 barriers (55 gal drum and 2 pallet stacks) shootin on the move and kneeling around the barriers.


10 yards, 8 rounds as fast as I can shoot (I'm slow) i pulled 2


10 yards DA only

all of this was in the first 200 round of buy this pistol so I'm still getting a feel for it but it and the .40 suit me just fine
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top