"The problems aren't the guns, it's the guns in the wrong hands,"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Desertdog

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
1,980
Location
Ridgecrest Ca
Boy, does he have it right. :)


Shootings fuel push to ease gun laws
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0403gun-laws03.html#

Kate Zernike
New York Times
Apr. 3, 2005 12:00 AM

Paul Bucher, the district attorney for the Wisconsin county where a man opened fire in a church service last month, killing seven people and himself, has one answer to the deadly mass shootings around the country in recent weeks: more guns.

"The problems aren't the guns, it's the guns in the wrong hands," said Bucher, a Republican who recently announced his candidacy for Wisconsin attorney general. "We need to put more guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens. Whether having that would have changed what happened is all speculation, but it would level the playing field. If the person you're fighting has a gun and all you have is your fists, you lose."

Across the country, efforts to expand or establish laws allowing concealed handguns have been fueled by the horrifying shootings in the past month - of the family of a federal judge in Chicago; at the church service in Wisconsin; at courthouses in Tyler, Texas, and Atlanta; and the nation's second-deadliest school shooting, on the Red Lake Indian Reservation in Minnesota.

In Texas and Illinois, the shootings prompted new legislation to allow judges and prosecutors to be armed. Legislators in Nebraska and Wisconsin, which were already considering allowing concealed weapons, say they think the shootings will help their cause.

Even supporters of gun control acknowledge that the atmosphere is sharply different than it was in 1999 when the nation's deadliest school shooting took place at Columbine High School near Littleton, Colo. Those shootings inspired a raft of gun-control proposals in Congress and in state legislatures and forced gun advocates to retreat from legislation they hoped to pass, including a Colorado bill to allow concealed handguns.

Then, the National Rifle Association scaled back its national meeting, held in Denver soon after the Columbine shootings, to one day from three, and with 7,000 protesters shouting outside, used the occasion to declare its support for trigger locks and "absolutely gun-free" schools. By contrast, after the recent shootings in Red Lake, NRA officials proposed arming teachers.

Supporters of gun control said their best chance now was to try to hold the line against more laws that would allow concealed handguns.

"We were very much more on the offensive after Columbine," said Josh Horwitz, executive director of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence. "It's just the way politics have worked. I hate to be in this position, but we are."
 
It's very refreshing to hear a politician taking this stance. I think it's common sense myself. As soon as people know that the helpless victims are not so helpless anymore they will really think twice. Furthermore if they are just plain crazy and still attempt shootings then maybe someone will stop them before they do a great deal of damage.
 
Looks like He's changing his statement now.

Sounded pretty good at first, but the most recent news release says that his declaration as of late consists of "taken out of context", etc. :banghead:

I thought we had something there.

Just one more WI politician ignoring the will of the people, in order to better his own situation.

I sure hope they figure out WHAT THEIR JOB IS sooner or later.

I'm sure that won't happen, but I still try to have hope.


I hope to meet a few of you (from WI) at the Defense Walk in Madison.

I can't think of a better place to meet some good, honest people.
 
"...I hate to be in this position, but we are."

- Josh Horwitz, Coalition to Stop Gun Violence
If that doesn't warm your heart...

- Gabe
 
Looks like He's changing his statement now.

Sounded pretty good at first, but the most recent news release says that his declaration as of late consists of "taken out of context", etc.

So do we blame the politician or do we blame gunowners for not being more involved? Because I guarantee that if he was hearing positive things from gunowners in large numbers, he wouldn't be backtracking.

We have to use the stick and the carrot in encouraging politicians to defend the Second Amendment. Smacking them on the nose when they do bad is purely defensive...
 
Who's hands are the wrong ones? And how do you tell the difference when the come to the counter in your shop?

This is kinda the problem. When we get too concerned with keeping guns out of someones hands the tendency is to paint with a wide brush "just to be safe" and a lot of decent people get denied their rights. Our legal system is based on the principle that it is better for a guilty man to go free than for an innocent man to go to prison. Our firearms laws should be the same way; better a person with "the wrong hands" get sold a gun than a person with "the right hands" get denied one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top