The sidearm nobody wanted.

Status
Not open for further replies.

armoredman

Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2003
Messages
19,197
Location
proud to be in AZ
No, not a Hi Point! Something else.

Picture a pistol, poly frame, striker fired, double action only, made in very recent times by a major European arms company with a reputation for reliabilty, durability, and accuracy. Picture this same gun being equipped with innovative features not found on any other sidearm, being made for a police contract, and having the ability to accept extra accessories via a frame rail. Picture it available in 9mm, and 40 SW, the two major LE calibers.

Then picture the world shaking it's head, heaving a deep sigh, and walking away.

Figured out this isn't a Glock story, didja?:p No, but some said this one was designed as an answer to Glock...

Nope, it's my favorite gun company's strange deviation, the CZ-100. This off beat gun has little in common with the much lauded and venerable CZ-75. The grip shape is slightly differant, the frame design unusual, and the trigger is WILDLY differant. Ever used a slingshot? That's what this is. The trigger has long take up, mostly used to simply get the trigger bar in contact with the firing pin, via a lower protrusion. A very simple device, it is virtually foolproof, yet the trigger pull is long, with a large stacking at the end, as the trigger retracts the firing pin to full back, then releases it. No partial stacking ala G-rock, but full DAO, just like a wheelgun. There is no accidental trigger pull with THIS pistol! if you want it to go off, you gotta be serious about it!:cool: Now I will say the trigger doesn't feel that bad to me, just like a long revolver trigger, which is what it aimed to mimic, and look forward to trying it out.
The trigger guard has a strange slot cut in it, for a propriatary "laser aiming device" that CZ dropped soon after, due to its' unreliability. One company makes a laser/flashlight combo that fits the odd ball short rails on the CZ-100, at lasermodule.com.
The rear sight is fully adjustable, undoubtedly to make "points" with GCA 68 import requirements. I would like to swap it for a sturdy solid rear sight -I never felt an adjustable was really neccesary or proper on a combat pistol.
Right in front of the rear sight is the unusual device that stands out on a CZ-100/110...the barrel block, AKA the one hand slide racking device. The strange block is designed, ( according to the semi-mythical police contract that supposedly gave rise to this pistol), to allow an officer to rack the slide one handed against a sturdy belt, without damaging the rear sight.
The CZ-100 languishes in history, neither loved nor depised,simply "there", and that's unfortuate, as I think it really has some interesting features. I look forward to the test firing this coming Monday.

CZ-100.jpg
 
My dad has one of these he bought a few years ago. I have no idea why - we were always a CZ75 family until I went over to the dark side and got into 1911s :rolleyes:
 
I had one for a short time...seems it took the trigger longer to break than I had it...:rolleyes:

Long trigger pull... the type that allows you to do other things while waiting for the gun to go bang...

For a company as great as CZ...the 100 is :barf: :uhoh: :confused: :eek: :what:
 
I had two friends in Georgia that had them. One in .40 and one in 9mm. Not the best looking or most ergonomic gun, but they were reliable and shot fairly well.
 
There is just something about a gun that find a good home. Congrats & don't forget the range report & pics ;)
 
The CZ-110 is a good bit better, but hard to find in the US. A friend of mine has one though. The 110 is interesting because it manages to be both striker fired and DA/SA.
 
CZ-USA never imported the 110, unfortunately. I would like to see it come in, but chances are slim.
The CZ-100 is a lot like E.T. - so ugly it's attractive. I actually like the way it fits and feels, and am looking forward to the test fire.:cool:
 
Having spent a fair amount of time with one, everything but the trigger is great. The trigger on the one I used (# A90xx) started worse than most airsoft pistols. Long pull, creepy, gritty, and inconsistent break: anywhere between 11 - 15 lbs. After some work, it improved to "below average".

It's a shame, because a bit of redesign and about $5 worth of improved parts & machining per pistol could have fixed it. Specifically the trigger bar and trigger bar disconnector need help. See http://www.cz-usa.com/data/downloads/support_manuals/CZ_100.pdf

The bottom line for me was that everything I like about it is also found on an XD-9, with none of the drawbacks. YMMV
 
Well..... i like the steel frame cz I own too much to look at much else. (hell, cz helped show me the light on what a good steel framed pistol felt like and handled like in the range...)
 
The CZ2000 is not made by CZ-UB. Purists, like myself, are quick to point that out..:)..I have heard it ain't bad. CZ-UB made/CZ-USA imported firearms will have the logo on the left stamped on the firearm or grips some where, and on the case. That's the CZ-UB trademark.
Ceska Zbrojovka means "arms factory", so is not trade-markable in the Czech Republic.
Gotta get some "inexpensive" 40SW ammo today, range trip Monday.
CZ.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top