Inspired by other threads about revolution and such...
The anti-gunners claim that there is no individual right to own a firearm, because the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution only applies to the states.
Imagine a very courageous governor who declares all federal gun control laws void and null in her state, because they infringe on the state's right to make gun control laws more liberal (ie - less restrictive) than federal gun control laws.
What legal arguments could the federal government make against the governor?
The anti-gunners claim that there is no individual right to own a firearm, because the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution only applies to the states.
Imagine a very courageous governor who declares all federal gun control laws void and null in her state, because they infringe on the state's right to make gun control laws more liberal (ie - less restrictive) than federal gun control laws.
What legal arguments could the federal government make against the governor?