TV tower planned location threatened with loss through eminent domain

Status
Not open for further replies.

Desertdog

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
1,980
Location
Ridgecrest Ca
Golden adds twist to TV tower dispute
written by: Adam Schrager 9NEWS Reporter
http://www.9news.com/acm_news.aspx?...MPLATEID=0c76dce6-ac1f-02d8-0047-c589c01ca7bf

9News reporter Adam Schrager says the future of a super TV tower on Lookout Mountain remains unclear. Aug. 30, 2005. 5 p.m.

GOLDEN - The city of Golden has offered to buy property on Lookout Mountain where Denver's main television stations, including 9News, want to build a new broadcasting tower. The City Manager says if the stations won't sell, Golden will exercise its powers of eminent domain and seize the land for open space.

"We think the price will be well worth their while to sell to us," said Golden City Manager Mike Bestor. "(If the stations won't sell), we'll take it. We'll use our powers of eminent domain and we'll go to court."

Colorado's General Assembly had recently passed a law prohibiting cities from using eminent domain for open space outside its borders, but the city of Telluride sued and a District Court Judge ruled the law was unconstitutional. Telluride and the prospective developers of its adjacent Valley Floor property have since settled and the case was never appealed.

9News and Channels 4, 7 and 20 are represented by an organization called The Lake Cedar Group. The group is seeking to build one 730-foot so-called "super tower" to comply with federal government requirements to send digital signals by January 2009. In exchange, the stations will remove three large existing towers and numerous smaller ones currently placed on Lookout Mountain.

A statement released by the Lake Cedar Group this afternoon criticizes Golden's position.

"Once citizens of Golden understand the cost associated with this proposal, they'll come to the obvious conclusion that this is not a good use of taxpayer money," the statement reads. "This is an effort by Golden to take away the decision-making authority of the Jefferson County Commissioners to make land-use decisions. The Jefferson County Commissioners are in the best position to make this land-use decision."

The Commissioners held a final public hearing on the matter Tuesday. Two times previously, they have approved construction of the tower only to have a Jefferson County District Court Judge send it back to them for further clarification. Their final vote is set for September 27.

The intent to buy the land was communicated in a letter from Bestor to Lake Cedar Group attorneys yesterday. Bestor says his city's move ensures the land will not be available for any future development.

"This is really a critical piece of property for open space purposes," said Bestor. "If you look around Golden, what makes Golden cool is undeveloped mountains.

"We feel this move is consistent with the will of our community and the will of most of the citizens of Colorado. They'd like to look at mountains, not at development."
 
Blargh

If you look around Golden, what makes Golden cool is undeveloped mountains.

Sounds like either a young person, or an unreformed hippy, by their language. Either way this city manager is stepping over a dangerous line. Is he really stupid enough to deny his consituents their TV signal? That's like taking a lion's food dish away before it's finished.

Then again, he's just another unelected beaurocrat, stuffing whatever he can down people's throats. :banghead:
 
Is he really stupid enough to deny his consituents their TV signal? That's like taking a lion's food dish away before it's finished.
Most people have cable; this won't likely affect their signals.

However, torquing off a TV station is generally a bad idea if you're in politics. Even if he's an unelected drone, he has a boss. And somewhere up the chain of command is somebody who'll be feeling the personal wrath of a major media outlet around election time.

This could get fun.
 
Golden Co. Hmmmm Coors Brewery is based there, major employer IRCC. Maybe a call to Coors would be in order.

"If this comes to pass, I'll buy no more products from you guys, of ANY sort"

Coors does more than beer last time I looked, also involved in material sciences and biotech.
 
As much as I find amusing the concept of a Ted Turner blowing a gasket over a scale-model mountain (complete with miniaturized antennae/buildings) in some drawing room deep below the Earth ("curse you, Hippieville!"), the frightening implications of seizure by eminent domain are enough to stay my laughter.

And as far as 'stupid' goes, in politics, it's never fully defined until election day. Without knowing more than this article states, kudos to this guy for taking a stand.
 
this is one use of eminent domain that makes sense.

THE REAL SCAM= they put up the "new tower" they don't really need.
WHY??

to sell hundreds of little stations on said tower to cell phone companies, etc.
it says they want a new tower, not that they dont have one already.
 
^
Actually, the station needs to put up the tower in order to comply with new FCC regulation. If they fail to comply, they are done. No more broadcasting by that station until they comply, if their license is not revoked entirely.

This stinks of something that happened to our local paper mill. The newly elected mayor started making it difficult for the plant to operate, and finally they're going to be bought out and a bunch of service-employment development built where 300+ high paying jobs used to be. More minimum wage jobs for prissy university students, more property and sales taxes for the city, but that many fewer good paying family wage jobs, in a depressed region of a depressed state.
'Coincidentally', the mayor had worked at that plant for a spell, and was 'let go' for unspecified reasons.
I just have to wonder if personal ire has something to do with this nonsense.
 
ok i see that. hmmmm. weird one.

how many other small stations are going to have the same problem i wonder.

sounds like something the people should vote on rather than let one person (or one corporation) decide since it will affect everyone.
 
Actually, the station needs to put up the tower in order to comply with new FCC regulation. If they fail to comply, they are done. No more broadcasting by that station until they comply, if their license is not revoked entirely.

I was wondering when somebody was going to make this point! To be a public broadcaster, you have to offer the signal free to the public. Trust me, cable 'ain't free!! :cuss: If the average person only knew the profits cable companys are making, it would make you sick. We have a small campus cable system here at work, and it costs us about $3 a month for each person we sell it to for $30 a month. And we are a smaller provider, so we pay a higher price that the city wide systems pay.
 
THE REAL SCAM= they put up the "new tower" they don't really need.
WHY??

to sell hundreds of little stations on said tower to cell phone companies, etc.
it says they want a new tower, not that they dont have one already.
Let me get this straight: you're saying THE REAL SCAM is that they (the TV station) improved upon property it owned as an investment to increase profit?

Wow. We certainly can't have that going on in a capitalist society, can we? Even without the FCC implications, it's their property and they ought to be entitled to use it in whatever manner they find most productive. If that means building a new tower and leasing space, so be it. What's the difference between that and, say, an apartmen building?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top