UnFrelling Believable

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sindawe

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
3,480
Location
Outside The People's Republic of Boulder, CO
Rember the guy in TN who shot and killed one of two crimminals who forced in to go to his bank and withdraw money? Well he's back in jail, for parole violation.

=====================================
Vigilante jailed; parole violation NOW he's a vigilante :banghead:
Jacob Evans has 1969 conviction for murder

By Lawrence Buser
Contact
August 25, 2005

The crime victim who has been widely praised and congratulated for killing one of the gunmen who tried to rob him two weeks ago is now behind bars for violating parole on a murder he committed 36 years ago.

Jacob Evans, 59, was not charged for killing one of the two would-be robbers on Aug. 9 outside of a South Memphis bank because the shooting was ruled justifiable, but he was taken into custody this week for violating terms of his parole by possessing a weapon.

He was arrested Monday and booked into Shelby County Jail. He will be sent to West Tennessee State Prison at Henning until a parole hearing can be held, said Bo Irvin, executive director of the Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole in Nashville.

The parole board will decide if he should be released or returned to prison to continue his life sentence. If returned to prison, he would still have the opportunity for parole.

Dist. Atty. Bill Gibbons said the murder conviction was not immediately discovered because computer records do not go back that far, but that it would have had no bearing on the ruling of justifiable homicide.

Evans was in jail garb Wednesday in Juvenile Court, where he was prepared to testify against the second robber he said he did not shoot only because the .357-Magnum he bought on the streets had jammed. Alonzo Teandra Thomas, 17, will be handled as an adult on charges of aggravated robbery and aggravated kidnapping.

Referee Herb Lane told Evans that whenever he is released to "keep a wide berth" and to have no contact with Thomas or his family.

Evans replied: "Believe me, I am not a troublemaker in no kind of way."

But there was trouble in his past.

On Feb. 1, 1969, Evans shot his mother-in-law to death by mistake when he was trying to shoot another man, records show. Ollie Lee Derdun, 54, of the 900 block of Texas was killed by a shotgun blast when Evans became involved in an argument with his estranged wife. Two other people were wounded.

Evans was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison. He began serving his sentence Sept. 16, 1969, and was released on parole in 1994 to authorities in Massachusetts, where he was wanted on another offense, Irvin said. He did not know the nature of that offense.

Irvin said Evans returned to Tennessee in November 1996.

Criminal Court records show that while in prison, Evans pleaded guilty to a 1989 drug possession charge.

The shooting this month, in which 17-year-old Leverett Dickson was killed, happened after Evans was jumped by two men as he drove to his home in the 300 block of Edsel.

He said the men forced him to drive to the First Tennessee Bank at 1200 S. Third, where one went inside to get a withdrawal slip. Dickson, who had a pistol and a .22-caliber rifle, stayed in the car with Evans, who reached under his seat, turned and fired six times at his armed captor.

He said he tried to shoot the other robber, but the $75 gun he bought on a parking lot jammed.

Evans told police the two were the same ones who robbed him of $465 three weeks earlier.

Gibbons said that under state law, a person cannot be charged with not having a gun permit if the gun is used in justifiable self-defense.

-- Lawrence Buser: 529-2385

Source:http://www.commercialappeal.com/mca/local_news/article/0,1426,MCA_437_4028404,00.html
 
Well, I have always had mixed feelings about the rights that are taken away from felons. But I dont know, he was convicted of a violent crime (I dont know of any more violent than murder). So he was not supposed to have a gun. But it is proof that the police cant protect us. What was he supposed to do, just let himself be robbed again? If this was a TV drama you would say "nah, that would never happen." Truth is stranger than fiction.
 
36 years ago he commits a murder (not sure how 1st degree comes from shooting an unintended person), pled to a drug beef in the joint and then, when on parole from a life sentence, :confused: bought himself an illegal handgun which he eventually justifiably used to defend himself from a robbery.

Not quite so simple as gang banger on gang banger. :scrutiny:

More like ex-felon on current criminal violence.

I see a Law and Order episode in this one.....
 
On Feb. 1, 1969, Evans shot his mother-in-law to death by mistake when he was trying to shoot another man, records show. Ollie Lee Derdun, 54, of the 900 block of Texas was killed by a shotgun blast when Evans became involved in an argument with his estranged wife. Two other people were wounded.
That's not your mother-in-law, that's a man, baby!

So his mother in law is a man, and Texas is just one really long street now. Good to know.
I think there's a lot missing from this "article."
No kidding.
 
Sounds like criminals preying upon criminals.

It is not OK for criminals to prey on criminals because it is not OK for anyone to prey on anyone. Let's not go the "he's a felon so he is not human route." If you have more info share it but dont go psychic and just tell us "there is more to it." What more to it is there?
 
This is why it's my belief that if someone is not in jail they should be allowed to own guns. If they are so dangerous that they can't be trusted to own a gun, they should not be outside of a prison/jail. This guy obviously is not a pillar of society, but he was determined to have paid his debts (regardless of whether any of us think he did, society says so) and so was released back amoung us.

Had he not had that gun he probably would have been killed, and the kids that tried to rob him would have gotten away to do it again. How can that possibly be a preferable outcome?

This guy has obviously kept his act together for the last 10 years, so I think it's probably fair, based on what info we've been given, to say he's not a danger to society. It should not be a crime for him to defend his life. If were on his jury for the gun possesion charge I'd vote not guilty.
 
sumpnz said:
This is why it's my belief that if someone is not in jail they should be allowed to own guns. If they are so dangerous that they can't be trusted to own a gun, they should not be outside of a prison/jail.
Exactly. Thank you.
 
It is not OK for criminals to prey on criminals because it is not OK for anyone to prey on anyone. Let's not go the "he's a felon so he is not human route."

I certainly didn't suggest or imply that it's okay for criminals to prey upon other criminals, nor did I suggest or imply that felons aren't human.

I mean this: it's extremely common for criminals to prey upon other criminals. I don't have any definite numbers; I wouldn't be at all surprised, however, to learn a third of all murder victims in the United States are convicted felons.
 
a third of all murder victims in the United States are convicted felons.

From what I've read, I wouldn't be suprised at half/two thirds.

Don't agree that it's right, but it would tend to point out that criminals mostly interact with each other. Almost like they're their own society.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top