Velocity vs. accuracy barrel

Status
Not open for further replies.

LR Sarge

Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2013
Messages
12
Location
North Eastern PA
I have a 30 inch Pac-Nor Super match grade barrel, chambered in .300 win mag with 3 lands and 3 grooves with a #8 straight taper. (4 inches of 1.2" dia. straight, then a taper to 1 inch @ 30".) This will be going on a blueprinted remington 700 LA, with a PTG .703 dia. bolt in a .705 bolt way. Trued face, threads, and lug surfaces.

I have 2 questions

1. What velocity can I achieve with a Hornady 208 gr with a lapped, 30 inch barrel 3 lands and 3 grooves?

2. Will I have much barrel whip with that contour at 30"? Will I struggle with accuracy? (8.6 lb barrel)
 
i doubt anyone could tell you what velocity you will achieve, even if they had an identical setup. are you using factory ammo? if so, which?

my guess is you will have plenty of barrel whip, but if you do a ladder test, you won't struggle with accuracy
 
Just reload for the best accuracy. After all, you aren't shooting horse shoes or hand grenades here.....chris3
 
About three or four years ago, we had a couple of guys posting about long-range shooting with 30" barrels. They said they were near one MOA at 1,200 to 1,300 yards with '06s with VLD bullets in the loads they'd worked up.

So, it seems to me that the key to success is in the particular load.
 
One of, if not "the", most accurate rifles I've ever owned is an early Ruger M77 in .250 Sav. I worked up the most accurate load I possible could and killed a dump truck full of deer with it. Finally when I got around to chronographing it the velocity was less than I estimated and, in fact, a bit slow, period. The barrel was a "slow" barrel but a stupendously accurate one. I love this rifle and it's load. Go for accuracy; forget about velocity.
 
Thanks for all the replies. I should give you a little more about the project that I neglected originally. The purpose for the build is to hit at 1 mile with as much consistency as possible. Every time I say that, someone completely original tells me that I should be shooting a .338 or a .408... lol Lets skip that. I had a Remington LA and I am going to make use of it. My self-imposed parameters or limitations are a 30 moa scope base, and a Nightforce NXS 8-32x56 which has a total of 65 moa vertical adjustability. I would like to zero at 100 yd and be able to dial to 1 mile. With that amount of drop compensation, I would need to get a 208 gr Hornady Amax with a bc of .648, to a speed of 3070 fps. or it will go subsonic before a mile, AND I will be out of adjustability in my scope/base. Several of you will want to recommend different weight bullets, but with the research I have been doing, the bullet is either too heavy to make the distance with the adjustability I have, or the bc is too low to make the distance with the adjustability I have. In other words the 208 gr Hornady Amax is the very best choice based on weight and advertised bc. With that bullet in mind, does anyone have experience with heavy contoured barrels, harmonics, and milking a barrel for every fps you can? I am hoping to achieve best accuracy over 3070 fps, and I am willing to try different powders (Retumbo, H1000, and the like) to get there, but based on my research it looks like the 208 Amax is the bullet I am stuck with unless I happen to be getting more speed out of the barrel then first expected. I agree accuracy is the biggest issue, but I am trying to make this into a 1 mile rifle...
 
i'd rather shoot a 6.5wsm or 6.5SAUM or 6.5-06AI etc etc pushing a 140 berger over 3300 fps, or any of the 7mm. I just don't care for the 300wm. most reports i've seen are people getting around 2850-2950 fps out of their 300wm with 208g amax. I know you picked 3070fps as a target because that's the velocity where the 208g goes transonic, but it doesn't make much sense to me to be overly attached to a mile.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top