Hi all, here in VT we have the latest bit of 'literal' gun grabbing legislation, seeking to obfuscate Constitutional rights. As what happens in a "frontier" state such as VT is likely to be visited on less gun friendly states such as yours, I think a open and broad dialogue on the tenets of our constitution as it relates to Constitutional infringement, without judicial oversight, is a compelling discussion to have. Do you think that the argument "if even one life is saved it will be worth it" is a argument superseding constitutionality?
Under H.422 all someone has to do is accuse you of domestic assault and even if there is no arrest, any officer responding can, on whim, decide the parameters and scope to which he interprets your rights to your property.
What do y'all think about our 4th, 5th, 14th rights being superseded without judicial oversight?
Under H.422 all someone has to do is accuse you of domestic assault and even if there is no arrest, any officer responding can, on whim, decide the parameters and scope to which he interprets your rights to your property.
What do y'all think about our 4th, 5th, 14th rights being superseded without judicial oversight?