Yep, I had the same thing happen with my Warne rings and a brand new Nikon scope.
Used a cheap torque wrench at it's lowest setting (broke two rules there). I figured that since the Warne spec for torque was 25 in-lbs, even at the lowest setting (20 in-lbs) if the wrench was off +/- 25% I would be in the neighborhood of 15-25 in-lbs. Within spec, but I still crushed the scope tube.
I'm not going to blame Warne, but 25 in-lbs of torque seems awfully high to me. I have a proper torque wrench now and would NEVER try to apply 25 in-lbs of torque to any rings or bases. As stated above, my max now is 10-15 in-lbs and a re-check after a range trip.
Used a cheap torque wrench at it's lowest setting (broke two rules there). I figured that since the Warne spec for torque was 25 in-lbs, even at the lowest setting (20 in-lbs) if the wrench was off +/- 25% I would be in the neighborhood of 15-25 in-lbs. Within spec, but I still crushed the scope tube.
I'm not going to blame Warne, but 25 in-lbs of torque seems awfully high to me. I have a proper torque wrench now and would NEVER try to apply 25 in-lbs of torque to any rings or bases. As stated above, my max now is 10-15 in-lbs and a re-check after a range trip.