What to look for in buying a used 1100?

Status
Not open for further replies.

556A2

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2002
Messages
604
Location
Asheboro, NC
I found a decent price on a 26" Skeet choked 1100. The shop has an online showroom, and mentions it has "seen some use". It has 90% bluing with many little marks, and 85% wood with many little marks.

My question is what should I look for in buying a used 1100, specifically for wear & tear?

I have owned a couple of 11-87 Premiers, but I bought both of them LNIB. So I really didn't notice any major wear.
 
First thing is the bluing and wood (older was before plastic ). Nice even wear isn't necessarily bad, but rust and or gouges are red flags to me. If they didn't take care of the outside I bet they didn't take care of the inside.
When you take it apart, look for wear on the metal. The magazine tube, the action bars, the link, where the locking lug engages the recess in the barrel. Sometimes you can tell more by running your fingers over it than by just looking. If the surface is noticeably lower than the adjacent metal, it has likely see quite a few rounds. Check how snug the barrel fits, and how much play there is due to wear in the receiver slots. Don't go by the sharp edges because those can be there after 100 rounds. Take the trigger group and move the carrier and look for wear, and cock the hammer if it isn't, and drop it with the trigger, catching it with your thumb, looking for excessive play. Anything other than the receiver and magazine tube is a drop in replacement, but at a price, so put the adding machine in your head to work.
The only 1100s I have ever seen with really noticable wear were skeet or trap guns. Some of them have seen hundreds of thousands of rounds. Haven't seen that many sporting guns for sale. I bought an old 28 gauge field gun that had been set up for, and used for, Skeet and Sporting; a lot of Skeet. The blue was a little thin, and the action bars were really worn, the link had a little wear, but everything else was great, and the wood was "new" because they had put checkered Sporting wood on it to shoot it. I replaced the action bars and link and have had no problems. She locks up tight and runs like a typewriter.
 
I asked an old gunsmith of great talent and knowledge this very question.

He had worked on 1100s with documented six figure round counts.

Besides the razor sharp internals, check the O rings and springs you can get to.

If I ran across an old 1100 that I fancied(and I like the platform) I'd replace the rings, all the springs, the link, etc.

HTH....
 
Look for any cracks that might develop towards the rear of the receiver. Check the condition of the piston and seal. I would plan on replacing the springs and the o-ring
 
This thread is right up the alley I was thinking. Was shooting yesterday with a bunch of gents. Lots of fancy guns, some good shots and some poor. I'm still running around town renting what the different ranges have to offer, seeing what I like and don't after a many year's hiatus.

Incidentally, shot a 20ga Ruger Red Label yesterday for 4 rounds of skeet...one of the few guns I can say I hated, until I remebered all the other Rugers I'd owned years ago. My scores were the same (17 avg) as with the 12ga's I've rented (Berreta 391 & 686), but the gun, with the auto-on safety each time you open the breech, and a trigger that felt like stepping on a bag of stale potato chips...I had forgotten how "k-mart" Rugers really are.

But I digress...One gent was shooting a plain jane 1100, and there was something so unassuming about the gun. American made, no pretense whatsoever. Even his technique was clean, simple, unadorned with any flourish. One guy shooting a duded up B-390 was a deadeye, but his technique was wild, if very effective.

I don't know...that 1100 just looked like the right gun for a man with nothing to prove, and had the scores to prove it!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top