Why Five Beans in the Wheel?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Did Colt SAA, or the like not have a safety notch/pin located on the cylinder face in the same manner as cap and ball revolvers like the 1851 Colt Navy? If they did have that I don't see what the issue with having all six chambers loaded as some how you would have to cock the hammer back, then have it land on the hammer. Which in that case an empty chamber wouldn't help either.

No, SAA don't have any kind of safety notch or pin like some of the percussion revolvers did.

What they DO have is a 1/4 cock position on the hammer. This keeps the firing pin from resting directly on the primer .

Problem is that a sharp blow to the hammer (like being dropped on it for example) will break this "safety" causing the firing pin to hit the primer hard enough for it to fire.

With the hammer fully forward the firing pin DOES rest on the primer. A good solid hit to the hammer will fire the gun.

With an empty under the hammer, the only way to make it go off is to cock the hammer all the way back so as to line up the next chamber.
 
Interesting omission by Colt to not have a safety notch/pin on the cylinder you could drop the hammer onto. That would have allowed complete safety when carrying 6 rounds. I certainly get why they always say carry 5 now.

-Jenrick
 
In the SAA, expecailly in 45 long Colt, there is no room for the firing pin to rest between the cartridges. Maybe in a 357 but not in the 45.

Same thing with a safety notch, no room for such a device. At least not a hammer activated one.
 
The article quoted by the op is from 1873. This was the first year that the Colt Single Action Army (aka the Peacemaker, M1873, etc.) with it's 7.5" barrel, was introduced and they about all went to the Army. So doubtful it was the SAA that went off when the fella dropped it.

A person always carried a Colt, Remington, S&W etc. in those days with the hammer on an empty chamber.

tipoc
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top