I understand what you're saying and I agree with you. But the original point that Lonerider357 was making is that he and his pals show up in period gear and using 19th-century guns (levers, SA revolvers, etc.) and beat the cops who are using their Glocks or M&Ps. In an equipment race, that makes it look like the autos are no advantage. I was simply changing WHO is behind the trigger to illustrate, the presumed obvious fact, that a competant shooter can do more, faster with an auto in most cases.USPSA has a revolver division. The revolver guys and gals don't win the overall (even Jerry) but some of them do very well. This is really a better comparison then the SASS shooters vs USPSA as the USPSA revolver shooter still have to meet power factors and they must reload after 6 shots. The SASS guns can't practically be reloaded on the clock. I shoot SASS as well as USPSA, these games are simply too different to compare head to head.
Which brings up another point: With a double action revolver, one can do most of his practice dry fire and at home, and it's almost as beneficial as the same amount of trigger time at the range with live rounds. You cannot say that about any other modern platform in a self-defense handgun, as you'd develop dangerous motor memory if you tried, such as recocking the hammer, or racking the slide, after dry firing each round.Yep, it didn't take me long and I didn't find it all that hard either. It only took a couple hundred rounds and dry firing to get it down to the point that it is second nature to me now.
Cowboy011 said:A good comparison between SASS shooters, USPSA, ICORE etc shooters head to head is Steel Challenge. No power factors, 5 rounds per string. Simply draw and shoot 5 targets. Steel challenge has a strong cowboy shooting contingent.
I agree. I have gotten some very nice OLD revolvers (Colts and S&Ws) for far, far less than the cost of a similar new gun. When I add whatever costs of re-bluing or smithing back to original condition, I am STILL out far less than a new gun, plus, I have something with some history.^^^^^^^^this is the answer
So few people care to buy a quality revolver. If they can sell the crap they sell at premium prices, why spend more to make less?
those of us that care about purchasing good quality revolvers are happy in the used market.
If you shop you can get some great guns.
In the past couple of years I have picked up several Colt and Smith revolvers (4 Diamondbacks, an Officers Target, a K22, a Cobra). The most expensive was cheaper than a "performance" center Smith.
So speaking for myself, due to price considerations, I am happier in the used market than I would be in the new market.
Nick, I applaud your statement. That is wise counsel.Don't take offense out of things people say about things used to be better,...Enjoy what you own and learn how to shoot it well. Your opinion is just as valid as anyone elses.