"According to Bowlcut, the only evidence that the rifle had ever been converted to full-auto is:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...bit of grinding visible to let the selector go all the way down...that little tang being ground down a bit....its externaly the same looking."
I'm fully cognizant of that, Tams.
My answer was based on his final question "Is it worth the hassles."
Quite frankly, I'd have to say in today's climiate, no it is NOT.
What's been mucked with internally that Bowlcut doesn't know about? Even more interestingly, why the specific wording on the question as it is? Was the gun someone's back shed project for the "illegal gun of the year" awards?
Remember, these days it's your word against theirs that you A) didn't know that the device had been messed with, and B) that you in fact didn't do the messing.
You want to be the once facing the Justice Department?
There are bells ringing here, and they aren't church bells.