Wow. Florida puts teeth in the 2nd...

Status
Not open for further replies.

onerifle

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2003
Messages
176
Location
Texas
It's a shame no one has the stones to get this intoduced inside The Beltway!...

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/content/auto/epaper/editions/today/news_0426466cf02df1eb0017.html

$5 million fine proposed for listing of gun owners

By Jim Ash, Palm Beach Post Capital Bureau
Thursday, March 25, 2004


TALLAHASSEE -- Squeezed between the cop on the beat and the powerful National Rifle Association, the Senate leaned toward the NRA Wednesday, tentatively approving a bill that would ban government and private lists of gun owners.

"This bill will stop law-abiding gun owners from being profiled simply because they are gun owners," said the sponsor, Sen. Durell Peaden, R-Crestview.

The measure (SB 1152) puts an exclamation point on the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment right to bear arms with criminal penalties and an unprecedented $5 million fine for anyone who knowingly violates its provisions.

In an unusually strong preamble, the bill raises the specter of Hitler's Nazi Germany and Fidel Castro's Cuba as examples of totalitarian regimes that registered and confiscated weapons. Gun registries are not a tool against terrorism but a potential weapon to "harass" law-abiding gun owners, the bill states.

"Further, such a list, record or registry has the potential to fall into the wrong hands and become a shopping list for thieves," the bill states in its legislative findings.

But crime fighting has proven to be the toughest hurdle for supporters, with police agencies across the state expressing concern that the measure would make it harder to track criminals.

Open-government advocates are also livid.

"There is no anecdotal evidence that I can find to show that people are being profiled," said Barbara Petersen, president of the First Amendment Foundation. "The danger is that there is no opportunity for law enforcement to keep track of people who are using guns to commit crimes."

The Senate was poised Wednesday to send the bill to Gov. Jeb Bush, since the House had passed it 81-35, but sponsors scrambled to make a few last-minute changes that will force the measure back to the House.

The bill already included a few exemptions, like lists of guns used in crimes or owned by felons, and "membership lists of organizations comprised of firearm owners," such as the NRA.

But Sen. Rod Smith, D-Gainesville, said the measure also needed to exempt police departments that store guns for vacationing owners and for weapons that are confiscated from the mentally ill or domestic-violence suspects.

"These were serious omissions that I think needed to be addressed," Smith said.

He said the compromise measures will assure support from law enforcement groups such as the Police Benevolent Association and the Florida Sheriffs Association.

Bush wants to see the final product before deciding whether to support it, a spokeswoman said. He has hinted he will approve it if police associations do, too.

NRA lobbyist Marion Hammer said she has heard complaints from motorists with gun racks who have been harassed by police, but she would not provide details.

"I said South Florida and that's as far as I'm going to go. You figure it out," she said.

She said the changes were window dressing for publicity-seeking opponents.

"It doesn't change the bill at all," she said. "It was comfort language for some people who were twitchy."
 
"Man. I wish the weather in Florida wasn't so humid. I'd be there."

You got that right, I want to leave for that reason, I've lived here (South Florida) my entire life and I can't seem to get used to the weather (to much Norman Blood)
 
"The danger is that there is no opportunity for law enforcement to keep track of people who are using guns to commit crimes."

Right... I forgot. Criminals buy their guns LEGALLY, don't they... :rolleyes:

Stupid statement.


Kudos to florida


James
 
Squeezed between the cop on the beat and the powerful National Rifle Association, the Senate leaned toward the NRA Wednesday, tentatively approving a bill that would ban government and private lists of gun owners.
I love the little editorial inserts like this that enforce the image that the NRA is a big, anti-cop organization trying to put guns in the hands of thugs out to kill anyone with a badge. :banghead:
"There is no anecdotal evidence that I can find to show that people are being profiled," said Barbara Petersen, president of the First Amendment Foundation.
I also can't get enough of folks who scream at the top of their lungs over other amendments in the BoR, but hold their nose when the 2nd comes up. :rolleyes:

Can't complain about the bill itself, though. :)
 
the bill raises the specter of Hitler's Nazi Germany and Fidel Castro's Cuba as examples of totalitarian regimes that registered and confiscated weapons.
Germany and Cuba?

Pshaw. New York City and California. Gun registration followed by gun bans followed by gun confiscations.

Rick
 
My local college paper had a typical reactionary editorial on this bill.
from http://www.alligator.org/edit/opinion/issues/stories/040317eddy.html

The House last week passed a bill that would prohibit gun shops from keeping electronic lists of firearm purchases for law enforcement agencies. The bill mandates that all lists be destroyed.

Regardless of one's stance on gun control, keeping track of gun purchases has proven effective in solving crimes involving firearms.
Police use these lists in investigations, cutting down on both time and expenses.

Backed by gun lobbyists, this bill does little to tackle serious constitutional questions.

The lobbyists argue that gun owners' privacy is at stake, but where does it mention in the second amendment that we have the right to secretly bear arms?

But then they gave me 150 words two days later
from http://www.alligator.org/edit/opinion/issues/stories/040319letts.html#2

Gun restrictions invade privacy rights

Editor: I was distressed to see the editorial staff rail against the privacy rights of gun owners in Wednesday’s paper.

Maintaining permanent, electronic, centralized lists of gun purchases is an infringement on the privacy rights of gun owners.

This law seeks to protect gun owners from the government snooping into their private lives and firearms collections by destroying these Orwellian lists.

Most criminals either steal their guns or purchase them illegally; legal sales are the last place a criminal is likely to get a firearm.

Legally purchased firearms are not the problem, so what is the purpose of maintaining these databases?

Gun registration programs are too intrusive, too expensive and not effective. The Canadian gun registry program has had its taxpayer budget balloon from $2 million to $1 billion and is a miserable failure as a crime-fighting tool.

Sacrificing my privacy rights under the guise of aiding the capture of criminals should be as abhorrent as sacrificing privacy rights to aid the capture of terrorists.

Just as the editorial board supports the privacy rights of minors who get abortions, they should respect my right to not have the government keep electronic data on my gun purchases.

The double standard you exhibit here is shameful.

Keep your laws off my guns.

Robert Schulte
Pistol and Rifle Club
3LS
 
Question... when was the last time someone who commited a crime with a gun, (i.e. robbing a 7-11) who was a legit gun owner? Criminals don't obey the laws, the very definition of criminals!!

Good for Florida, for doing this. I hope more states follow. This is basically discrimination based on owership of property. Horrid...

This law seeks to protect gun owners from the government snooping into their private lives and firearms collections by destroying these Orwellian lists.

The problem is that most students don't know what an "Orwellian list" is!!:banghead:
 
The bill already included a few exemptions, like lists of guns used in crimes or owned by felons

A list of guns owned by felons. Huh?

There are good parts of Florida and bad parts. It can be different as night and day.

I got land west of the capital near the Alabama border. Was out shooting on the property one day with an M14 making quite a racket just wastin ammo. The local Sheriff deputy heard it down the road a piece and came to see what was goin on. I saw him pull in and quit shootin. His eyes got all big and I offered to let him shoot it, which he did with a big grin on his face.
After cleaning out two magazines he said be careful and have fun and left.

On the other hand in PB county, had a suppressor on an AR15 at the local range which happens to be the PB County sheriffs range. I was put thru the third degree about the legal ownership of said item. Most of the training officers there kept saying it was illegal to own in private hands(morons), One guy wanted to call the ATF and have them come out. I was glared at like I was some kind of nut.
I finally left disgusted at the attitude and have never returned to OUR public range.

The deputy in the pan handled never once asked about the legal staus of the M14 or for the tax certificate or nothin.

Retirement can't come soon enough.

Some counties have no problem with a gun rack in the truck window. Others will swarm the swat team if you are spotted with one.

Its funny(sad) how the same laws effect the whole state but how differently each county can apply them.
 
I can vouch for Florida's panhandle. I lived in or near Pensacola for ten years, and was a member at Escambia River Muzzleloader's. Very gun-friendly area (and the reason Bush won Florida, IMO).
 
::::::"There is no anecdotal evidence that I can find to show that people are being profiled," said Barbara Petersen, president of the First Amendment Foundation. "The danger is that there is no opportunity for law enforcement to keep track of people who are using guns to commit crimes.":::::::


yeah, the first amendment foundation.....maybe they should read past article 1 on the bill of rights and check out the rest of the constitution.....but something tells me they wont:rolleyes:
BSR
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top