Search results for query: *

  1. T

    Homeland Security now "shoot to kill"?

    Carry'in Thats quite a stretch you just made...
  2. T

    Homeland Security now "shoot to kill"?

    Smurfslayer, You contradict yourself nicely.
  3. T

    Homeland Security now "shoot to kill"?

    ...and one other thing while we are at it...the only thing that makes this whole thing noteworthy is that the English are such hoplophobes, that when the police actually do shoot someone (even if its a clean shoot) it makes national news for quite a while. US police have basically always had a...
  4. T

    Bin Laden

    An interesting proposition...but the problem with it is the huge amounts of funding that Bin Laden brings to the equation. Money talks and bull???? takes a big walk, even with turds like Al Queda.
  5. T

    Homeland Security now "shoot to kill"?

    Actually, from the reports that I've read, that is precisely the case. While one innocent death resulting from police direct action is unfortunate, the thousands of deaths resulting from homicide bombers is far worse. Even doctors make mistakes while performing surgery. This is no...
  6. T

    Homeland Security now "shoot to kill"?

    Its kinda like porno or obscene material...you know it when you see it. As for the poor dude in England that ran and was killed for his efforts...its a shame. But thats what terrorism causes. And we either deal with it or give in to it.
  7. T

    this seems strange, even by California standards

    Sounds like a self serving BS article to me. Where was it published? What is your source?
  8. T

    Glock 17 Problem ??

    OMG! You mean to tell me that a Glunk is actually malfing?
  9. T

    Homeland Security now "shoot to kill"?

    Cool.... As it should be! Death to all terrorists! :D
  10. T

    The Vice Presidential debate

    Unbelievably Even FOX is showing about a 60/40 split with the majority saying that Edwards won...:rolleyes: Its going to be a loooooong four years. :barf:
  11. T

    The Next Waco?

    Or spell it? :D
  12. T

    The Next Waco?

    :)
  13. T

    The Next Waco?

    If you could point out a system that will give us better than 2%, then I'm all for it... (What was that sound...I can hear a pin drop...)
  14. T

    The Next Waco?

    Yes. An unfortunate and reoccuring theme here...
  15. T

    The Next Waco?

    Well, now, thats a leap of conclusions. But now that you mentioned it, thats probably pretty true. I'd bet the percentages hover around 98% get what they got coming.
  16. T

    Illinois: Shooting at State Capitol!

    Let me guess...the Cigarette Smoking Man? :eek:
  17. T

    The Next Waco?

    Its amazing the amount of bandwidth that is taken up here in defense of miscreants, criminals, felons and thugs... And the offense taken towards LEOs. An upside down world exists here. :uhoh:
  18. T

    Seriously: Is it time to start USING the Second Amendment?

    Quite likely, your death and a smallish tombstone that will soon be forgotten along with your act of foolishness. Kinda like that turd McVeigh.
  19. T

    Seriously: Is it time to start USING the Second Amendment?

    Lord knows that worked like a champ the first time! :rolleyes:
  20. T

    Seriously: Is it time to start USING the Second Amendment?

    \ Wow. Want a gold star? :rolleyes:
Back
Top