Or should I just switch to series 80's for the peace of mind.
I'm not sure a Series 80 would provide any additional peace of mind. Occasional "functional tests", with an unloaded gun, might make one feel a little better.
The one I'm thinking of is to push, firmly, on the hammer with the trigger pulled, following a slide cycle. This checks to see how well the disconnector, sear and hammer are working. It is only a check, as it isn't done at actual speed, but if you can force the hammer to fall, something's worn.
The Series 80's have additional parts (as you know) that provide a firing pin safety. If you have the trigger pulled, these parts are "out of the way" so the gun fires normally. IMO, a worn sear/hammer hooks would drop the hammer, Series 80 or not. The next notch should catch it, unless the disconnector has totally failed.
As I understand the design, the firing pin safety was to remove the slight possibility of discharge when dropped on the muzzle. Which usually required a 4ft drop onto concrete.
If you put thousands of rounds through your 1911, you could have a competent gunsmith "change parts" to get rid of the worn ones. I have no idea when this would be a good idea. 20,000 rounds?
On the other hand, if you're worried about hammer release when it's cocked and locked, the Series 80 does offer additional safety against ADs, as the trigger isn't pulled when the gun is holstered. The thumb safety blocks the sear (and hammer?) and the grip safety blocks the trigger, so the design is pretty foolproof as is. Adding the firing pin interlock says, "Well, in case all of that other stuff fails, at least the firing pin can't move."