CopperFouling
Member
I am not trying to start an argument about the terminal effectiveness of the .223. I am, though, interested in trying to determine the source of what may or may not be an Internet myth.
Almost every time that I've read a thread about the .223's effectiveness, someone says something along these lines: "The military designed the round to wound people so that others would have to carry the wounded person to safety, keeping three people from fighting instead of one."
My question is this: has anyone ever seen a credible source for this comment? A government publication? A high-ranking military officer's comments? Anything?
I am not interested for any particular reason (I shoot mostly handguns and shotguns) except that I see that line repeated ad nauseum online.
Almost every time that I've read a thread about the .223's effectiveness, someone says something along these lines: "The military designed the round to wound people so that others would have to carry the wounded person to safety, keeping three people from fighting instead of one."
My question is this: has anyone ever seen a credible source for this comment? A government publication? A high-ranking military officer's comments? Anything?
I am not interested for any particular reason (I shoot mostly handguns and shotguns) except that I see that line repeated ad nauseum online.