DetroitStudent
Member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2006
- Messages
- 50
Question to all of you experienced 357 people out there,
As a new CCW carrier, I have a number of 357 loads to choose from. From a number of forums, I have heard that the traditional 125 grain hollow point available from many manufacturers at 1450 ft per second (under-charged 357 125 grain loads we will not discuss), is an underpenetrator, and one should go with a heavier load as it is not a good idea if said assailant is heavily clothed.
At the same time, others contend that the 357 125 grain is the standard upon which good rounds are based. Combat distances (at least in my case as a CCW holder) will most likely be between 5-10 feet.
So guys, what do you use and why? Are stories of underpenetration true? Stories of one load or the other working or why you made your choice are encouraged.
Detroit Student
As a new CCW carrier, I have a number of 357 loads to choose from. From a number of forums, I have heard that the traditional 125 grain hollow point available from many manufacturers at 1450 ft per second (under-charged 357 125 grain loads we will not discuss), is an underpenetrator, and one should go with a heavier load as it is not a good idea if said assailant is heavily clothed.
At the same time, others contend that the 357 125 grain is the standard upon which good rounds are based. Combat distances (at least in my case as a CCW holder) will most likely be between 5-10 feet.
So guys, what do you use and why? Are stories of underpenetration true? Stories of one load or the other working or why you made your choice are encouraged.
Detroit Student